M114 Lawsuit Filed!!!

[MxOverkill]

Gotcha. It's probably because it's a left wing agenda. If it was right wing they would be done.

Or...it's because rather than understanding the IRS rules regarding permissible lobbying by 501c3 organizations, folks just keep telling and repeating opinions....opinions that are not correct. And around and around it goes on here.

 

[156256Hunter]

Their website still has the donate button for $$$. I assume they took money after the organization was administratively dissolved in September.

What's the legal or tax implications for a legal entity or it's owners/officers taking donations after the entity has been administratively dissolved? And for presumably using that money?

*"Asking for a friend."

 

[Provincial]

Perhaps the decision to let Lift Every Voice lapse is intentional. By lapsing, the entity may be considered to no longer exist, and thus be beyond reach for civil damages. If so, it is yet another admission that the whole Measure 114 fiasco was intentionally promoted knowingly in violation of Constitutional Law, as well as the Oregon prohibition against multiple subjects.

All this strengthens the case for violation of constitutional rights under color of law. Also conspiracy to commit that crime.

Think about it. Would a reasonable jury consider that promoting a successful ballot measure that denied women the right to vote be considered to just be exercising their 1st Amendment right to free speech? Would a Secretary of State and Attorney General that certified the measure for the ballot be innocent of violating civil rights under color of law?

Lawmakers acting in session are currently held immune for actions that violate rights, but that is a holdover from the Common Law rule that "The King Can Do No Wrong." It is an assumption that legislators are not subject to the Constitution that empowers them. It doesn't make sense.

 

[Flopsweat]

Perhaps the decision to let Lift Every Voice lapse is intentional. By lapsing, the entity may be considered to no longer exist, and thus be beyond reach for civil damages. If so, it is yet another admission that the whole Measure 114 fiasco was intentionally promoted knowingly in violation of Constitutional Law, as well as the Oregon prohibition against multiple subjects.

All this strengthens the case for violation of constitutional rights under color of law. Also conspiracy to commit that crime.

Think about it. Would a reasonable jury consider that promoting a successful ballot measure that denied women the right to vote be considered to just be exercising their 1st Amendment right to free speech? Would a Secretary of State and Attorney General that certified the measure for the ballot be innocent of violating civil rights under color of law?

Lawmakers acting in session are currently held immune for actions that violate rights, but that is a holdover from the Common Law rule that "The King Can Do No Wrong." It is an assumption that legislators are not subject to the Constitution that empowers them. It doesn't make sense.

I think I recall reading that you can't just dissolve a company in order to avoid a lawsuit - the parties involved can still be sued. Not a lawyer though, and I'm not in the mood to look this one up just now.

 

[Hooyah DeepSea]

And speaking of which, State law says that if they create a program, they have to fund it; which means we have to fund it through taxes. So, optimistically speaking, if they fund this load of garbage, maybe it will take funds away from the CRT, 1619, and the 'trannies for kindergarteners' programs.

See, it ain't all bad!!!

 

[Cavedweller]

So, optimistically speaking, if they fund this load of garbage, maybe it will take funds away from the CRT, 1619, and the 'trannies for kindergarteners' programs.

Don't count on it. The established pattern is to make up the shortfall by cutting essential services, followed by a tax increase to restore those services to a barely acceptable level.

 

[dinky450]

I think I recall reading that you can't just dissolve a company in order to avoid a lawsuit - the parties involved can still be sued. Not a lawyer though, and I'm not in the mood to look this one up just now.

Once the company is dissolved you can't sue the company, but depending on the structure the company was filled under INC, LLC, ect.... you could go after the owner it's self for liability but have to prove the owner themselves did all the damage. Being INC makes it super hard as there is no real owner as the president works for the company. Construction companies change names all the time to avoid lawsuits for shifty work. You can still go after their insurance and bonds as those never go away but the president/ owner is no longer liable. Taxes are a whole different category.

 

[GripItAndRipIt]

Gun rights group, sheriff file federal lawsuit to block Measure 114, call it unconstitutional - KTVZ

Three weeks before Measure 114 is scheduled to go into effect, a federal lawsuit has been filed to block the voter-approved gun regulation measure, one of the strictest in the country, claiming it is unconstitutional in several ways.

ktvz.com

You know you've gone too far when you've lost the socialists. They ought to read up on some of the more famous socialists: Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Castro... what did they all have in common? If you said "disarmed populous" you are right!

 

[156256Hunter]

On the Portland subreddit, numerous people who identified themselves as far left/liberals, posted that they didn't want 114, because the special permit would add more law enforcement as gatekeepers between them and their right to obtain a firearm.

 

[Stomper]

Yet I'm sure they're ALL FOR mandatory COVID vaccines, etc, etc, etc….

I don't give a rat's sphincter holster what any statist loving leftist thinks or has to say…..



about anything.

 

[bbbass]

Yet I'm sure they're ALL FOR mandatory COVID vaccines, etc, etc, etc….

I don't give a rat's sphincter holster what any statist loving leftist thinks or has to say…..



about anything.

Well, you SHOULD! Because they are making the laws in OR today!!!

 

[Member 5605]

CHL's and handshakes

 

[Stomper]

Well, you SHOULD! Because they are making the laws in OR today!!!

I didn't say I don't pay attention to their idiocy and take note, I said IDGAF about their contradictory blatherings…. as in their deluded "opinions" aka "feelings"…. as in, I place a higher value on my dogs' steaming piles they leave in the yard over what they have to say.

 

[Bacon Camp]

Voters fooled by Oregon Measure 114

Readers respond: Voters fooled by Oregon Measure 114

Letter to the editor

www.oregonlive.com

 

[PiratePast40]

https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/Pages/pressrelease.aspx

Anyone know why the Republicans haven't made any preparations for the 2023 session but the Democrats already have their leadership team in place?

 

[GripItAndRipIt]

On the Portland subreddit, numerous people who identified themselves as far left/liberals, posted that they didn't want 114, because the special permit would add more law enforcement as gatekeepers between them and their right to obtain a firearm.

Irony so rich and creamy a person could drown in it.

 

[GripItAndRipIt]

On the Portland subreddit, numerous people who identified themselves as far left/liberals, posted that they didn't want 114, because the special permit would add more law enforcement as gatekeepers between them and their right to obtain a firearm.

Irony so rich and creamy a person could drown in it.