Sanctuary?States cannot nullify a federal statute. .
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sanctuary?States cannot nullify a federal statute. .
Section 18-3315A – Idaho State LegislatureDoesn't Idaho's governor promotes building your own suppressor and not applying for a tax stamp as long as you don't take it out of state.
I did not read the links but I know if it was me I would have been far more careful. I have never heard of NFA items that you did not need the stamp for. Ditto to the poster asking about the shop that sold the damn thing. How are they not in the hot seat too?
Whether you meant it or not, that comes off as elitist AND as sound advice all at the same time.Don't post your backwoods NFA items on Zuckbook
I have never heard of NFA items that you did not need the stamp fo
For those not following along, there are states that prohibit NFA items on their own accord. A federal tax stamp will allow SBRs, SBSses, suppressors, FAuto, etc according to federal regulations... but some states usurp those rules and forbid all or some of those banned items.This defendant was unfortunately gullible.
Another good reason to live in Idaho
Another good reason to live in Idaho
No no no....it is terrible here. The snow is everywhere and you need a UTV just to get around. Stay safe where you are my friend!The Gem State is looking better all the time.
No no no....it is terrible here. The snow is everywhere and you need a UTV just to get around. Stay safe where you are my friend!
DEA harassed and bused plenty of pot shops a couple years ago. dunno if they still do it, but there certainly were a lot of raids a couple years ago.Meanwhile Pot is federally illegal and state legal.
Hypocrisy at its finest.
States only get to circumvent federal law on items that the furor sees fit.
I HATE snow but DESPISE tyrants... snow it isNo no no....it is terrible here. The snow is everywhere and you need a UTV just to get around. Stay safe where you are my friend!
No no no....it is terrible here. The snow is everywhere and you need a UTV just to get around. Stay safe where you are my friend!
We are working on thatWe tried that here in Oregon. (sub rain for snow). Didn't work. Still got over-run by Californians. Looks like you
are getting quite a colony of them in Boise. Have you considered nuking them from orbit?
************************************************************Gun Owners of America Funds Challenge to National Firearms Act in U.S. Supreme Court | GOA News - Published Jan 15 2019
https://gunowners.org/images/Kettler-Petition-for-Certiorari.pdf - GOA's petition to the SCOTUS
https://gunowners.org/images//Kettler-Appendix-Final.pdf
From the article:
The Kansas statute declares that any suppressor manufactured, possessed, and used within the borders of Kansas is exempt from federal law. Relying on that Kansas law, in 2014 Jeremy purchased a suppressor from a local military surplus store, but did not register it with ATF pursuant to the National Firearms Act (NFA).
Believing he was following the law, Jeremy posted a video about his new suppressor on Facebook, and ATF swooped in. Rather than simply requiring Jeremy to register his suppressor, the feds instead chose felony prosecution — to make an example of Jeremy, and to intimidate all who resist federal power over guns. Jeremy was indicted, and convicted of possessing an unregistered silencer, and now this veteran is a federal felon.
GOA and GOF have stood with Jeremy, both in his appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, and now in the U.S. Supreme Court.
Today GOA and GOF lawyers, representing Jeremy, filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the Court to hear Jeremy's case. The petition challenges the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, which rejected Jeremy's appeal from the district court.
Jeremy's petition first challenges the legitimacy of the National Firearms Act, which was passed in 1934, and thereafter upheld by the Supreme Court in 1937 under the constitutional power of Congress to "lay and collect taxes." The petition argues that the NFA as it exists today no longer can be justified as a so-called "tax."
Ok to get around federal law with weed but not with a suppressor.
YES!The Problem is The Authority of The Federal Government is actually limited by the Constitution. They have the Power to Tax and Regulate "Interstate Commerce" , they are Not supposed to regulate "IN State Commerce". They Have used Liberal Judges to skirt this authority using legal mumbo Jumbo by claiming "well, the raw materials Moved interstate " or " the parts Moved interstate or Internationally" and with lawyers writing laws that can be interpreted in Several ways the whole system is flawed and will remain as such until The Supreme Court gets cases and does Rulings.
Classifying a Suppressor as a Firearm has always been a Classic example... it is NOT a firearm , it is an Accessory , and yet it has never been officially challenged in The Courts.