Bronze Lifetime
- Messages
- 783
- Reactions
- 1,195
These guys had a better case than OFF, as everyone in this forum was bashing NRA just days ago, but they actually had the better case and presented better argument.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
These guys had a better case than OFF, as everyone in this forum was bashing NRA just days ago, but they actually had the better case and presented better argument.
Yes this has been brought up that the off case was rushed. Still I think the other federal lawsuits go to the same judge though who clearly has her own perspective. I don't know if the state case would hold up except in an appeal outside of the Oregon supreme court.These guys had a better case than OFF, as everyone in this forum was bashing NRA just days ago, but they actually had the better case and presented better argument.
Any case going to Immergut will be ruled anti-gun because she has decided to blatantly ignore the instructions from SCOTUS not to use a 2 step process of balancing of "societal good" vs individual's right.Yes this has been brought up that the off case was rushed. Still I think the other federal lawsuits go to the same judge though who clearly has her own perspective. I don't know if the state case would hold up except in an appeal outside of the Oregon supreme court.
I don't think all is lost just that the hopes of a lasting injunction are bleeding fast.
yesWhat in the hell are dealers supposed to do with the thousands and thousands of arms they have in back rooms with +10 magazines that are waiting to clear background checks? Will they have to peel the magazines out to let them go after 12/8? So much horsepuckey.
Does anyone know if sportsman's wearhouse is handing out magazines for already purchased guns (but stuck in background check queu)? If not does anyone have a number to their regional manager in Oregon I can call?
I was curious how much of this is politics from the ninth as well.Any case going to Immergut will be ruled anti-gun because she has decided to blatantly ignore the instructions from SCOTUS not to use a 2 step process of balancing of "societal good" vs individual's right.
I don't know if this is out of ignorance or if the CA 9th circuit has advised her, effectively making her a Guinea pig re going against SCOTUS.
I strongly suspect the latter because she will have a favor due from the 9th which would be a promotion for her. Also CA has been playing a delaying game on the BONTA mag ban case. They may be using Immergut to be the Guinea pig before they defy SCOTUS themselves a few months from now when Bonta gets appealed after the Benitez ruling that is coming up.
State Circuit Court. Applies to Oregon State but I'm curious about the apparent conflict between District Court decision vs State Circuit decision...So does the circuit court order supersede the federal judge? Or does this only apply to Harvey County?
No it is valid for all of Oregon as it was a separate case brought about on the infringement to the Oregon Constitution. It will be appealed to the Oregon State Supreme Court though which almost all of them have been appointed by Kate Brown.So does the circuit court order supersede the federal judge? Or does this only apply to Harvey County?
Two different court systems. One case was brought on the constitutionality of the US Constitution, and one was brought in a state court against the state constitution. I wish it included the single issue ballot measure.So does the circuit court order supersede the federal judge? Or does this only apply to Harvey County?
Yep everything for the whole state is decided by one, or a few metro counties. Sucks. One group of judges appointed by the leftist metro power base tells the entire state what to do. That's why this is no longer Oregon, it is now "California North".Two different court systems. One case was brought on the constitutionality of the US Constitution, and one was brought in a state court against the state constitution. I wish it included the single issue ballot measure.
The state AG will appeal to the State Supreme Court and slap this down.
Have her thrown off the bench, in a normal judicial system this would have already happened to many of the far-left constitution defying judges...I would love to see a good SCOTUS biach slap a ho!
Too bad Maxine does not do legal research and social-criminology research on this important topic; but maybe the folks are her facility do not have the intelligence nor education to do this; geez--properly educating the public with unbiased information is too much to ask.OR state asking for more time from federal judge/anti-gun crusader Immergut (Surprise, surprise ha ha). Note that this relates to Fed case, not Harney County judge state case.
View attachment 1334381
Unfortunately, I've repeated some of the things she's said, and later found out it was her opinion being thrown in with select facts. I've learned my lesson.Too bad Maxine does not do legal research and social-criminology research on this important topic; but maybe the folks are her facility do not have the intelligence nor education to do this; geez--properly educating the public with unbiased information is too much to ask.
Yep everything for the whole state is decided by one, or a few metro counties. Sucks.
Red counties voted down M114:
View attachment 1325421
How exactly do you throw a lifetime appointed federal judge off the benchHave her thrown off the bench, in a normal judicial system this would have already happened to many of the far-left constitution defying judges...
I don't know the mechanism but she has clearly violated her oath and what she said in her appointment hearing, that she will abide by the precedent of the Supreme Court. She has ignored the very clear precident and directives in the Bruen ruling, and instead let her own personal anti-gun views determine the ruling. She said she would not do this when appointed.How exactly do you throw a lifetime appointed federal judge off the bench