- Messages
- 18,744
- Reactions
- 45,458
Damn straight, lots of people dying in piles of brass.If it ever gets to that point, I'd say on day 91 things will get two-way SPICEY….
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Damn straight, lots of people dying in piles of brass.If it ever gets to that point, I'd say on day 91 things will get two-way SPICEY….
However, if you bought anything thereafter, I would bet they could maybe have probable cause for saying you probably had something before 8/15, especially if there were any 4473s for any of those guns bought before 8/15, even though you could say they were sold before 8/15. If they can get the warrant and they find those guns in your possession when you should have turned them in...So, me thinks, for an Oregon resident, anything acquired prior to August 2015 they'd be hard pressed to prove you still owned as private sales without a BGC we're still perfectly legal. Anything acquired after July 2015 you'll be on the hook for chain of ownership…
The Idaho Constitution prohibits registration of firearms and there is no requirement to use a FFL to transfer a firearm to another Idaho resident. There are also no BG checks for those of us with concealed carry permits, as is the case in many other states. So any any trail will go dead pretty fast. All but one of my ARs was built from a stripped lower, which could easily be replaced with a lower machined from an 80% lower or a solid block of 7075. But the best answer is WWHBD?So, me thinks, for an Oregon resident, anything acquired prior to August 2015 they'd be hard pressed to prove you still owned as private sales without a BGC we're still perfectly legal. Anything acquired after July 2015 you'll be on the hook for chain of ownership…
The point is that if they do come to your your door looking for a gun you are under no obligation to still have any gun that you bought after filling out a 4473. That could mean you dont actually have it or it could mean you that you say you dont have it. Prove otherwise.In Oregon, those rules of freedom no longer apply. What I meant was, if not clear enough, is that I personally filled out a 4473 for all my firearms. I have exactly zero bought private party so if .gov had all my 4473s in hand, I wouldn't have any that weren't on that list. There would, of course, be many on that list I do not have from as you suggested, selling. Kind of my Achilles heel
This works until the feds pass universal BGCs - the stated purpose being registration. The eventual goal is mandatory turn ins & then forceful confiscation, the PTB knowing they can't do confiscation until they have registration of the majority of firearms. Eventually, after universal BGCs and partial registration, they (gun control advocates) will say that there are too many guns that are not in the system and pass registration of all guns.The Idaho Constitution prohibits registration of firearms and there is no requirement to use a FFL to transfer a firearm to another Idaho resident. There are also no BG checks for those of us with concealed carry permits, as is the case in many other states. So any any trail will go dead pretty fast. All but one of my ARs was built from a stripped lower, which could easily be replaced with a lower machined from an 80% lower or a solid block of 7075. But the best answer is WWHBD?
The goals your are speaking of are the goals of the Marxist/Globalist who want to enslave us and who know that they cannot do so while we are armed, even if we only have infantry weapons. When they get embolden enough to think that they can take our guns is when they will find out what the 2A is truly about. And it is not about hunting deer or elk, but rather tyrants!This works until the feds pass universal BGCs - the stated purpose being registration. The eventual goal is mandatory turn ins & then forceful confiscation, the PTB knowing they can't do confiscation until they have registration of the majority of firearms. Eventually, after universal BGCs and partial registration, they (gun control advocates) will say that there are too many guns that are not in the system and pass registration of all guns.
From what I have read, HEARD AND never done personally is that GUN BUY BACKS in many states ALL ACROSS this nation do NOT require WORKING or NON working complete guns.My prediction is that it would wind up in court after a few people try to get away with turning in only the serialized part. Either that, or the pols that write the law would take it into account, but even then it would still be a bunch of "what ifs".
I have read that gun buy backs require a working gun? But that is a buy back, not a mandatory turn in.