How the downfall of net neutrality will effect the second amendment

[Jamie6.5]

Capitalism believes in free and open markets, hence, net neutrality! OR the ISPS should be open to completion, and not enjoying the single/few source markets that they enjoy now.

And capitalism says anyone that wants to invest the money to build another network, and buy the easements, lease the pole space, and install the server farms, and pay the regulatory fees, can do just that.
The only thing stopping them is state and local government regulations.

And make no mistake, "net neutrality" as sold to us by the obama administration involved more federal regs on top of those, not less.

 

[PaulB47]

Net neutrality advocates want government to protect them from the big corporations. Net neutrality opponents want the corporations to protect them from big government. The amusing thing is that big global corporations, and the US government, are one and the same.

At some point, the Internet is destined to turn into a steaming pile of sh*t (if it ain't already there), no matter which side wins. The good news is that the people now know they like such power of communication, and will always gravitate to those who will provide it.

 

[Heywood]

Capitalism believes in free and open markets, hence, net neutrality! OR the ISPS should be open to completion, and not enjoying the single/few source markets that they enjoy now.

Capitalism believes in free and open markets. So we should use title II rules made for 1930s telecom and pushed by the most anti free market group of people in modern American and global politics....