Another reason to not use cyanide traps...
Feds kill wolf in Wallowa County on private land with cyanide trap
Feds kill wolf in Wallowa County on private land with cyanide trap
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
[QUOTE="SparksFly, post: 1637492, member: Oregon's ecosystem has adapted to not having wolves and in order to actually restore Oregon to its previous state (pun intended) would require the killing of ALL coyotes since they are nonnative and then the introduction of wolves but that would require too much.
Actually, I think they did kill the "target species."Just to clarify: It's not the killing of the wolf that bothers me, it is more the inability to kill the target species without killing other animals.
I would agree. Oregon's ecosystem has adapted to not having wolves and in order to actually restore Oregon to its previous state (pun intended) would require the killing of ALL coyotes since they are nonnative and then the introduction of wolves but that would require too much.
Not trying to be a jerk but this is from the article.Actually, I think they did kill the "target species."
The target species was a canine animal preying on livestock. We've known for decades coyotes are a problem (Eat More Lamb, 2 million coyotes can't be wrong!), so what if the next oversized rat of the canidid species takes the 'yotes place?
Should it make a difference to the rancher if he loses his livelihood to a wolf rather than a 'yote? A loss is a loss to him/her. This notion that the ranchers of the west need to stock the feed trough so the city-dwelling weekend warriors of the wildlife viewing crowd can get their annual thrill is preposterous.
The only downside I can see to this is it may reduce the trapping effort(s). But it won't if it's viewed through the proper perspective.
So are both coyotes and wolfs not canine species that prey on livestock?Not trying to be a jerk but this is from the article.
View attachment 348100
I know you can shoot a domestic dog and I have no sympathy for the wolf either, it was just stating that the target species was not canines in general, as you stated, but rather coyotes, which are canines, but ODFW was not targeting canines in general.So are both coyotes and wolfs not canine species that prey on livestock?
I don't know if you're aware, but domestic dogs caught chasing or preying on livestock may legally be shot on sight in Oregon. Is one canine sub-species so much more valuable than the next?
I have virtually no sympathy for the wolf, or the misguided efforts to bring it back in Oregon. They are a throwback species very well suited to a wild ecosystem that no longer exists in the lower 48 of the US. Man gets blamed for extirpating the wolf here, but we find them in abundance a mere 500 miles north of the OR/WA border.
Since we know they have the ability to migrate that far in a matter of months, what will we do if they leave again? Start over with another planting program?
Sorry Sparky, but for my money, one canine preying livestock is much like another.I know you can shoot a domestic dog and I have no sympathy for the wolf either, it was just stating that the target species was not canines in general, as you stated, but rather coyotes, which are canines, but ODFW was not targeting canines in general.
No need to apologize. A coyote is essentially a miniature wolf.Sorry Sparky, but for my money, one canine preying livestock is much like another.
Totally! The cyanide traps are just not effective. With these they just aren't safe.I just read that article.
When are the feds going to stop this. If I was that family I would sue for enough my kids could retire.