Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 8,290
- Reactions
- 18,092
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Commentary here, but we'll see where it goes.
National Defense Resources Preparedness executive order: Power grab or mere update? « Hot Air
Peter
It's been in place since 1951, they just keep updating it every presidency.
Parallax is right.
Here's another decent breakdown: Activist Post: New Obama Executive Order Seizes U.S. Infrastructure and Citizens for Military Preparedness
The major distinction seems to be that while war time or related circumstances already have seizure laws (paper with scribbles and fancy stamps) this one covers peacetime.
I doubt it. I have spoken to quite a few people who are in the age category to remember those times (including my parents) and my conclusion is they were more reactive to the issues at the time as opposed to thinking about what could or might happen. There is no denying the instant, worldwide communication we have now is partly responsible for the way we now think due to our ability to instantly share ideas, thoughts and beliefs, and that includes perpetuating fear mongering which has ultimately led many to the New Style of thinking of 'when it happens' as opposed to reacting to what does happen.I wonder if this is how the world felt in the late 1930's on the eve of WW2?
They don't just want your guns, they want you dead if you love the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and if you are the Posterity of the founders
Google the Ukranian Holomdor..(genocide of white Christian Russians by the communists, under the control of the commissars 90% of whom were jewish and hated christrians) food and fuel will also be a weapon for your genocide
I think it goes even deeper back to The Declaration of Independence. Starting with its first words & lasting only up until the second sentence; it was not all written in the same day & you can feel the passion in the writer from the start & how it changes to reason's in why we should limit such absolute freedom later within it's context. But it started with absolute freedom (absolute freedom enables you the freedom, to limit as much as to grant such as it is, to another)
"When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."