- Messages
- 5,152
- Reactions
- 11,451
"Why are state police using public resources to patrol land owned by private timber companies?"
Just to present "the other side": 1) whatever the line/boundary may be, one side of it IS "public lands"; 2) that 'private timber company' has as much access public LEO presence to assist in maintaining 'private property rights' as the rest of us want; given the absurd levels of dumping, property damage, various confusion by those too dumb/young/stoned/drunk/ig'nant to understand their opportunity to trespass is NOT a given right to do such.
Access to private land can be withdrawn at any time.
Just to present "the other side": 1) whatever the line/boundary may be, one side of it IS "public lands"; 2) that 'private timber company' has as much access public LEO presence to assist in maintaining 'private property rights' as the rest of us want; given the absurd levels of dumping, property damage, various confusion by those too dumb/young/stoned/drunk/ig'nant to understand their opportunity to trespass is NOT a given right to do such.
Access to private land can be withdrawn at any time.