National Comrade Wyden: Pack the USSC

[2nd Amendment]

If Democrats ever get this done, all of the great pro-gun decisions from the current USSC will be reversed:

Democrats Won't Give Up on Efforts to Pack the Supreme Court As New Bill Drops

redstate.com

Read More

 

[KKlassy]

The Dems are going full tilt to change rules, laws, et al to get their way regardless of trampling individual liberty

 

[CamoDeafie]

 

[P7M13]

Wouldn't this require 2/3rds majority because it's a constitutional change?

 

[Ura-Ki]

Wouldn't this require 2/3rds majority because it's a constitutional change?

Yes, AND, that party knows full well that 1) they will never gather the needed 34 states to do this, and 2) if it did, the next step would surly kill it dead, there is no way in hell 2/3 of american citizens would vote in support of those changes!
Lastly, that party also knows that a convention works both ways, bringin one could seriously backfire on them, with our side making YUGE demands of them. and having the 34 states to flex it, not a good plan and they know it!

 

[Barefootdog]

Why are we represented by someone who lives in New York City?

 

[CamoDeafie]

Why are we represented by someone who lives in New York City?

Because voters are dumb and because he still has an Oregon residence that he probably rents out

 

[Cavedweller]

Wouldn't this require 2/3rds majority because it's a constitutional change?

Yes,

No, The NUMBER of justices on the SC is not set in the Constitution. It can be changed by legislation.

What part of "checks and balances" don't they understand? The system is working just like it's supposed to. To Wyden, restoring balance seems to mean 1 party rule.

 

[nammac]

The Dems are going full tilt to change rules, laws, et al to get their way regardless of trampling individual liberty

Until the "other" party is in power and plays by the same rules. Then the democrats begin their toddler tantrums.

They need to tread lightly, lest the same actions be taken against them…

 

[nammac]

Yes, AND, that party knows full well that 1) they will never gather the needed 34 states to do this, and 2) if it did, the next step would surly kill it dead, there is no way in hell 2/3 of american citizens would vote in support of those changes!
Lastly, that party also knows that a convention works both ways, bringin one could seriously backfire on them, with our side making YUGE demands of them. and having the 34 states to flex it, not a good plan and they know it!

50 state constitutional carry…. Period…

 

[Aero Denezol]

Why are we represented by someone who lives in New York City?

Great question. I keep voting for the other guy but we never win.

 

[nammac]

Great question. I keep voting for the other guy but we never win.

That cause they stacked the deck against us with "mail in balloting". Make people show up and prove who they are in order to vote, it's the American way!!!

 

[CamoDeafie]

50 state constitutional carry…. Period…

50 State full recognization of 2A's full meaning (no restriction on types of arms or manner of keeping and bearing), full repealment of NFA, GCA, FOPA Hughes Amendment, full sacking and removal of Fed District Judges that violate Constitutional protection of citizens, and then maybe we can talk about stacking SCOTUS