- Messages
- 14,015
- Reactions
- 57,157
You smoke weed 3 weeks ago youll test positive for thc. Its not a real thing.
Unlawful possession of a firearm is real...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You smoke weed 3 weeks ago youll test positive for thc. Its not a real thing.
Not really. There is a high threshold test but someone who is a heavy user could not have smoked weed for a week and the blood level would still be over the threshold and he wouldnt feel anything. Cops relly on field sobriety tests way more than on blood tests when it comes to drugs. Any yellow pages bottom of his class lawyer would get a casual user tests results thrown out . If youd like to cite precedence please do. You cant.
Cite a case where someone was charged and convicted for having thc in his system and lost gun rights because of that. Not talking about posession or distribution.You shoot someone breaking into your house and they find 1/2 pound of weed in your sock drawer youre probably going to jail . 1/4 ounce in the sock drawer and you arent stoned at the time not so much.Unlawful possession of a firearm is real...
Cite a case where someone was charged and convicted for having thc in his system and lost gun rights because of that. Not talking about posession or distribution.
It doesnake a difference. Case law, precedence and actual police practice mean a lit more,than internet lawyer gibberish.What difference does it make? If you possess a firearm and are found to have used something that you lied about on your form 4473, you're asking for it.
Priors, etc. More to the story I'm sure..
No the story said he was a prohibited person in possession. That could mean he was prohibited for something else ( like he appears ) and also tested positive.Read the next one. He plead guilty to unlawful firearms possession charges due to testing positive for THC, making him a prohibited person.
Not really. There is a high threshold test but someone who is a heavy user could not have smoked weed for a week and the blood level would still be over the threshold and he wouldnt feel anything. Cops relly on field sobriety tests way more than on blood tests when it comes to drugs. Any yellow pages bottom of his class lawyer would get a casual user tests results thrown out . If youd like to cite precedence please do. You cant.
No the story said he was a prohibited person in possession. That could mean he was prohibited for something else ( like he appears ) and also tested positive.
Damn, well pot use got real expensive for him.
Guy was lucky he wasn't stuck with a public pretender, really.
All associated stories just harped on the positive THC test for nothing. Ok.
It also kept harping on the fact that he was a prohibited person in possession. I'm seeing anex felon in possession who shot his girlfrieend and also tested positive for THC and other stacked charges.