Gold Lifetime
- Messages
- 3,868
- Reactions
- 3,788
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was told they won't even sell you ammo?
If your not wearing the new state approved ''Trigger finger modulating safety''.
View attachment 533998
That cancer is just creeping north...
Seems like all that checking makes a drive to Nevada more of a payoff than just a Vegas+Booze run.
I recall learning in history class about some guys who were being taxed and regulated without any political political representation, making the worlds largest batch of cold tea...Choices seem to be ignore the law and take your chances with what I believe will initially be a misdemeanor. Or any of the following lawful actions:
1.) get a FFL03 plus CA COE (Certificate of Eligibility). This will allow for out of state ammo to still be shipped directly to your address. (Note: the bummer here is that after paying the State for a piece of paper that says you are eligible to purchase firearms and ammo you now will have to pay to verify that the notice is valid
2.) have a direct relation - wife to husband / father to son / grandfather to granddaughter - gift ammo bought out of state before crossing the line
3.) as mentioned elsewhere in the post, learn to reload. (Note: powders and primers are not currently addressed but who knows what the future holds.)
4.) play the game and buy from an authorized ammo dealer/vendor in-state and pay the background check fees each time you purchase.
These new policies are up for review in the next 30 days with implementation supposed to be 7/1/2019.
Since at least early Obama I think, they have been trying to force sneak in requirements for primers that expire. This would address ammo stockpiling and reloading. If your primers go dead, all ammo would have limited shelf life.I wonder when they'll go after the reloaders? Or would reloading components be included in a general definition of "ammunition"?
Well, appearantly the good people of Kommiefornia like their Nanny State, they keep electing the same people over and over...Other California gun controls which took effect January 1, 2019, include an expansion of training requirements necessary to acquire a concealed carry permit and inclusion of certain misdemeanors as justification for a lifetime ban on gun ownership.
The Wall Street Journal reports that misdemeanor domestic violence charges–such as "harmful touching of a spouse, roommate or dating partner"–can now be treated on part with domestic violence felonies and result in a total forfeiture of Second Amendment rights.
Life time loss of firearm rites for "Harmful touching" WTH is that!!. It's gotten to the point where I'm afraid to even look at another person for fear of being charged with some new made up crap felony. Good Lord I want off this ride!. We somehow need to hit the flush lever and start over.
Well, appearantly the good people of Kommiefornia like their Nanny State, they keep electing the same people over and over...
Me thinks this country needs one voting system, that requires positive identification of the individual about to cast the vote, you know, to be sure they're actually eligible to vote...
If I have to produce identification to take a minor child to the doctor, then the least a voter can do is provide identification prior to voting...
Understood... And you have a valid point. But the good citizens of the west coast need to get more involved and help better candidates to be filter up for elections.Ah.....no, I don't.
Perhaps it is not so different from the question do the people of OR like their governor? What about OR or WA state legislators or AGs?
We get what we get with uninformed/uninvolved electorates and assault politicians who are not held accountable.
Same garbage will infiltrate the rest of the west coast. In the past I've suggested that real estate owners and those who actually pay income taxes should be the only ones that get a vote, cause they're paying the bills... Seems there some opposition to that idea... Wonder why?Agreed, more involvement and prolonged voter education would be a good thing.
I do believe voter ID and one voter/one vote requirements would be a good thing. However, in California it will be stringently opposed even though the common citizen would not be against it. We are having an increasing problem with "vote bundling" by activists. Combine this with past motor-voter initiatives and some current municipalities working towards allowing non-citizens to vote (eg. SF) and it is a big problem.
Same garbage will infiltrate the rest of the west coast. In the past I've suggested that real estate owners and those who actually pay income taxes should be the only ones that get a vote, cause they're paying the bills... Seems there some opposition to that idea... Wonder why?