Yes........have you ever been near a Python, an old Smith or even a Trooper MKlll? Rugers are very crude. I think it helps to keep the cost down from the investment cast Parts they are made with.Ummm Rugers are "crude"??
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes........have you ever been near a Python, an old Smith or even a Trooper MKlll? Rugers are very crude. I think it helps to keep the cost down from the investment cast Parts they are made with.Ummm Rugers are "crude"??
My brother, 3 of my buddies and I all have Pythons. Not that tough to afford.My Ruger Redhawk 7.5" is one of the best looking revolvers made. Not quite a Python, but who can afford those anymore. It also can handle any commercial .44 Mg load made (for revolvers). Smiths wilt at some of the Buffalo Bore loads. My Security Six is a smaller version, but just as nice. If you want ugly, look at some of the Smith and Wesson Performance series. The 460VXR comes to mind.
Yes. I've handled a decent sampling of Pythons and have owned pre WWII Colts, Pre model number Smiths and even a good old Trooper III. (The Trooper is one that I miss...)Yes........have you ever been near a Python, an old Smith or even a Trooper MKlll? Rugers are very crude. I think it helps to keep the cost down from the investment cast Parts they are made with.
Need I go on, all smith and wessons. Do you think that the Super Redhawk (not my favorite, but looks good with a scope attached) is uglier than any of these. I would rather have a Taurus.View attachment 395728 The only thing attractive about a Red Hawk is the part they plagiarized from Colt and Smith. Off course....it is strong but weighs 6 oz more than a M29 too. That is how junk investment cast parts are made strong. Is there anything uglier than a Super Redhawk?......and you need a dedicated gun bearer to carry it.
The gun that is most often close to me every day is my 4" 629. I find the longer barrels unwieldy in a belt holster.
What, the cylinder part with holes drilled in it? lolView attachment 395728 The only thing attractive about a Red Hawk is the part they plagiarized from Colt and Smith. Off course....it is strong but weighs 6 oz more than a M29 too. That is how junk investment cast parts are made strong. Is there anything uglier than a Super Redhawk?......and you need a dedicated gun bearer to carry it.
I have a Python, a Smith 28, several Colt autos etc etc. Rugers are investment cast as I understand it, and Bill Ruger perfected the process. Less expensive yes. "Crude"? wahttayou smokin? LOL The perfecting of investment casting is putting the forged firearms out of the market. The use of stainless steel is rendering the old blued guns too fragile and rust-prone to carry in the woods. Just sayin.Yes........have you ever been near a Python, an old Smith or even a Trooper MKlll? Rugers are very crude. I think it helps to keep the cost down from the investment cast Parts they are made with.