JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
Thanks, Nick.

Sheesh, 14 already. Well, it's only Monday.

And, no 'fix up' bill for 114.

A couple are not bad things, and several SB/HBs are apparently the respective house copies of the same bill.

Directs Department of Justice to study ways to address unlawful possession of firearms, and to provide results of study to interim committees of Legislative Assembly no later than December 31, 2024. (apparently dupes HB2373)

Allows gun dealer or person transferring firearms, firearm accessories, ammunition or ammunition components for purchase at gun show, or business engaged in repairing or servicing firearms to establish minimum age of 21 years for such purchases, repairs or services.

Requires school districts to provide specified information related to secure storage of medications and firearms.

Directs Oregon Criminal Justice Commission to classify crime of felon in possession of a firearm as crime category 8.

Authorizes governing bodies of certain public entities that own or control public building to adopt policy, ordinance or regulation or precluding affirmative defense for possession of firearms in public building and adjacent grounds by concealed handgun licensees (Seems to be the same as HB2007)

Proposes amendment to Oregon Constitution establishing right to carry concealed firearms (Looks good by that description, but let's see

PARAGRAPH 1. Section 27, Article I of the Constitution of the State of Oregon, is amended to read:
Sec. 27. (1) The people shall have the right to bear arms for the [defence] defense of themselves, and the State, but the Military shall be kept in strict subordination to the civil power.
(2) The right described in subsection (1) of this section includes the right to carry a concealed firearm.
PARAGRAPH 2. The amendment proposed by this resolution shall be submitted to the people for their approval or rejection at the next regular general election held throughout this state.
(Doesn't mention licenses, so 'Constitutional Carry'; so, of course, DOA.)

Defines "undetectable firearm." Punishes manufacturing, importing, offering for sale or transferring undetectable firearm by maximum of 10 years' imprisonment, $250,000 fine, or both (AG Rosenblum wants this - dupe of HB2874, still a waste of time. But at least she asks instead of Making Stuff Up like California)

Authorizes governing bodies of certain public entities that own or control public building to adopt policy, ordinance or regulation or precluding affirmative defense for possession of firearms in public building and adjacent grounds by concealed handgun licensees. (Bad, so almost certain to pass)

Directs Department of Justice to study ways to address unlawful possession of firearms, and to provide results of study to interim committees of Legislative Assembly no later than December 31, 2024. (Oooh! A 'study'.)

Exempts from private transfer criminal background check requirement transfer of curio or relic firearm to person licensed as collector under federal law. (As described, innocuous to positive)

Requires district school board or higher education governing board that adopts policy limiting possession of firearms by concealed handgun licensees on school grounds to install metal detectors at entrances to buildings subject to policy. (Ah, the "let us get serious" bill.)

Defines "undetectable firearm." Punishes manufacturing, importing, offering for sale or transferring undetectable firearm by maximum of 10 years' imprisonment, $250,000 fine, or both. (Waste of time)

Repeals requirement to secure firearm in specified circumstances.

Repeals prohibition on carrying concealed firearm on person or possessing concealed, readily accessible handgun within vehicle
 
"but nobody's trying to take away your guns"


Correct me if Im interpreting this wrong, but whats especially egregious is the multiple ones authorizing the state to be authorized "to to adopt policy, ordinance or regulation or precluding affirmative defense for possession of firearms in public building and adjacent grounds by concealed handgun licensees." instead of the building user. So then all the remaining public schools that didn't post GFZ signs the state dept of education can now declare those places GFZs.
And any other public building that hasn't already.
 
"but nobody's trying to take away your guns"


Correct me if Im interpreting this wrong, but whats especially egregious is the multiple ones authorizing the state to be authorized "to to adopt policy, ordinance or regulation or precluding affirmative defense for possession of firearms in public building and adjacent grounds by concealed handgun licensees." instead of the building user. So then all the remaining public schools that didn't post GFZ signs the state dept of education can now declare those places GFZs.
And any other public building that hasn't already.
I read the text as requiring the 'owner' agency to do that, not any old State agency. Seems to me that local facilities are owned by districts.

I think this part is much more fun - proposed new text

(3) The governing body of a city, county, district as defined in ORS 198.010 or any other entity that falls within the definition of "municipal corporation" in ORS 297.405 may adopt a policy, ordinance or regulation providing that the affirmative defense described in ORS 166.370 (3)(g), concerning persons licensed to carry a concealed handgun under ORS 166.291 and 166.292, does not apply to the possession of firearms within buildings and on grounds adjacent to buildings owned or controlled by the governing body.
That might easily be interpreted to cover parking lots and driveways at airports - no more CCW-armed driver dropping off passengers.
 
sunday-gunday-glock-7-porcelain-gun-made-in-germany-undetectable-37087448.png
 
HHHMMM, minimum age of 21 years but yet we induct 18 year old folks to serve in the military and risk their lives. Seems like this age of "maturity" was lowered during the Vietnam War but now it is OK to ask folks under age 21 to fight and die for their country but deny them their 2A rights? There are a lot of hypocritical issues today that harken back to them days.
 
Introduced today. Makes illegal the possession, transfer, import, etc of unfinished frames/receivers and unserialized firearms. Also declares a state of emergency.


I see no transition period for serialization and no grandfather clause. Exemptions for dealers, antiques, and pre-1968 firearms.

EDIT: Looks like I missed this earlier thread. Mods please feel free to lock, merge, etc as appropriate. Thank you.
 
Last Edited:
Please explain to me how they plan to find it if it is "undetectable". If they find it and charge me, then it was not undetectable was it?
 
Some text from the legislators web site...
What a pile of dog sh!t. All I can see here is destroying everything the 2nd is about.

Dan

Relating to firearms; declaring an emergency.
Catchline/Summary:Defines "undetectable firearm." Punishes manufacturing, importing, offering for sale or transferring undetectable firearm by maximum of 10 years' imprisonment, $250,000 fine, or both. Punishes possession of undetectable firearm by maximum of 364 days' imprisonment, $6,250 fine, or both, and 10 years' imprisonment, $250,000 fine, or both, upon second and subsequent convictions. Punishes possessing, offering for sale, selling or transferring firearm without serial number by maximum of $1,000 fine upon first conviction, 364 days' imprisonment, $6,250 fine, or both, upon second conviction, and 10 years' imprisonment, $250,000 fine, or both, upon third and subsequent convictions. Defines "unfinished frame or receiver." Requires gun dealer to conduct criminal background check before transferring unfinished frame or receiver. Punishes importing, offering for sale or transferring unfinished frame or receiver by maximum of $1,000 fine upon first conviction, 364 days' imprisonment, $6,250 fine, or both, upon second conviction, and 10 years' imprisonment, $250,000 fine, or both, upon third and subsequent convictions. Specifies exceptions. Punishes possession of unserialized unfinished frame or receiver by maximum of $1,000 fine upon first conviction, 364 days' imprisonment, $6,250 fine, or both, upon second conviction, and five years' imprisonment, $125,000 fine, or both, upon third and subsequent convictions. Provides that person commits crime if person possesses unfinished frame or receiver and is prohibited from possessing firearms. Punishes by maximum of 364 days' imprisonment, $6,250 fine, or both. Declares emergency, effective on passage.
 
"but nobody's trying to take away your guns"


Correct me if Im interpreting this wrong, but whats especially egregious is the multiple ones authorizing the state to be authorized "to to adopt policy, ordinance or regulation or precluding affirmative defense for possession of firearms in public building and adjacent grounds by concealed handgun licensees." instead of the building user. So then all the remaining public schools that didn't post GFZ signs the state dept of education can now declare those places GFZs.
And any other public building that hasn't already.
SCOTUS already ruled against this in New York. Apparently Oregon legislators are either stupid, retarded or simply completely treasonous…
 

Upcoming Events

Redmond Gun Show
Redmond, OR
Klamath Falls gun show
Klamath Falls, OR
Centralia Gun Show
Centralia, WA

New Resource Reviews

New Classified Ads

Back Top