- Messages
- 237
- Reactions
- 536
In a unanimous ruling, the state's high court said the measure (976) was unconstitutional because it combined more than one subject in one initiative — which the state constitution forbids. Eight of the court's nine justices also said the initiative had a misleading title, striking it down on that basis as well.
How does this ruling differ with 1639?
~Whitney
How does this ruling differ with 1639?
~Whitney