JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
My only takeaways thus far.

The Montana town ( and P.D.) aren't named.

The Wa judge isn't named.

Other than that, it sounds like Schrodinger's busy as usual.

Because we're likely to never get what this " one question " is.
 
This scenario slightly worries me.

My ex-wife is paranoid and very vindictive.

I avoid contact with her as much as possible (blocked on FB, I do not answer phone calls from unknown numbers, etc.).

I have not had any contact with her for years (last contact was years ago - at least 6 years - when she used FB PMs to contact me, and then threatened something about me regretting (some years in the future) not responding to her - probably a misunderstanding of how SS benefits work for divorced spouses, then sent a letter to my sister in law making allegations against me).
 
If WA reports "denied parties" to the fed system, that would impact the gun owner in MT for any new purchases even if local LE doesn't get involved. Gonna take a wild guess that their process for auditing the denied party list for accuracy / current status is either non-existent, or exists on paper only.
 
I wonder if the gun owner has legal recompense (civil and/or criminal) against the person who made the false accusation?
That would probably be a tough case to win, you would need to prove that the person that made the accusations knew they were false and did it with malice instead of just being mistaken or concerned
 

Upcoming Events

New Classified Ads

Back Top