Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wonder if you drop a Glock with a Sig mag in it if it will discharge.
I think they're outside of Spokompton.Great video. Where are they that there is PNW type landscape, and yet lots of sirens in the background?
Near JBLM. I've run into both of these guys.I watched the original video recently, it's pretty good, those guys seemed to have a lot of fun together at the range.
I think they're outside of Spokompton.
-Robert
Crazy sig allows such things, p365, and p320 public betaFunny, but no. Glock doesn't use the general public to beta test their prototypes.
I think Sig blew it with the 320 and 365 from the get-go.Funny, but no. Glock doesn't use the general public to beta test their prototypes.
You never know when a Sig will "work".But will a Glock mag work in a SIG?
A very spot on post and that is without throwing in the whole 320 debacle. I'd still rather have a P228/M11 (or any P series) than what they are putting out now. FN and Walther, hell even those guy putting bullets backwards in theirs mags are making them look bad IMO.I'll clarify my post about the 320/365. Sig was in the same spot that Glock is in currently. They had one design that was adapted to most of their guns. P220 through P229 are basically the same gun in their original form as a DA/SA gun. Same as Glock.
Sig was in the position to adapt or die. The Glock 19 and 22 had entered supply chains in some military units and has had a firm grip on LE. Smith and Wesson was able to take some market share in the LE and competition market with the M&P. The DA/SA guns that had made Sig famous were starting to lose popularity. Not because they're bad guns, but because people want simpler, more cost effective guns.
Striker fired guns have some advantages without the need of a mainspring/hammer. There is no need for the gun to sit high on the hand because the frame doesn't have to accommodate a hammer strut and spring. Instead of creating a new frame with a slide that fits low to the hand, they basically retrofitted the P250, a hammer fired gun, to be striker fired. That was strike one with me.
The modular FCS is a neat idea and I believe it played a role in getting the M17/18 contract. However, like previously stated, they seemed to rush it out there. A thorough R&D should have identified the problems that seem to be fairly common in the world of repeatable malfunctions. Strike two.
The 320 and 365 haven't been out long and it seems like new changes are released yearly. Cosmetic stuff and a shuffle of where the sights are or what they're mounted to, etc. It makes me, as a consumer, wonder when they're going to feel secure that the gun they made is fine the way it is. Strike three for me.
My SIGs work just fine, all the time.You never know when a Sig will "work".