Diamond Supporter
Gold Lifetime
- Messages
- 830
- Reactions
- 1,278
They just decided to NOT hear the case, so the ban is left standing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I will take all your guns and magazines at 40% value. Better jump on it, as they are soon to be worthless.Well, this pretty much paves the way for the AR-15 and similar rifles to be banned. It has now been determined that the Constitution does not protect our right to own such firearms.
Say so long to your rifles. Best thing for everyone to do is to sell their rifles and high cap magazines now, while they are still worth something.
View attachment 298358
Tyranny. It is only going to get worse.
Say so long to your rifles. Best thing for everyone to do is to sell their rifles and high cap magazines now, while they are still worth something.
View attachment 298358
I'm going to start a different thread about whether selling existing items will likely be allowed during such a ban. It was during the last ban but who knows with this one. Those who try to buy thousands of pmags and make a 1,000% profit on them may end up being left with a bunch of stuff they will get a $25 Safeway card for in a Gestapo gun buy back.
Unless they plan on coming to get them they will be worth a lot in a few years. Just look at Machine guns. If they are planning to come get them I'll need them to make the confiscation part a little more difficult.
Look at state laws like the ones in Connecticut and California. You cannot transfer the rifles to another person inside the state. If you want to sell the rifle, it has to go to someone in another state where it is still legal to buy and transfer such rifles. A father cannot even leave his AR-15 to a son, in a state where a ban exists.
But if Clinton is able to get such a law implemented on the national level, then where would you be able to sell the rifle?? It would then be illegal to purchase everywhere.
.
The Supreme Court refused to hear a challenge to assault weapons bans passed in Connecticut and New York today. By not hearing the case they are allowing state /city laws exist that violate the 2nd amendment.
Supreme Court turns down assault weapons cases (http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2016/06/20/supreme-court-guns-assault-weapons-connecticut-new-york/86133004/)
the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday upheld the broad reach of a federal law that bans people convicted of domestic violence from owning guns.
No way in the world, if you met these guys, would you walk out of the room and agree with this idea that everyone who wants to be armed should be.