Other State Supreme Court revisits the scope of the right to bear arms in the wake of latest mass shooting

[The Heretic]

https://www.cnn.com/2023/11/07/politics/supreme-court-second-amendment-rahimi/index.html

US Supreme Court mulls legality of domestic-violence gun curbs

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday began hearing arguments on the legality of a federal law that makes it a crime for people under domestic violence restraining orders to have guns in the latest major case to test the willingness of its conservative majority to further expand gun rights.

www.reuters.com

Read More

 

[Oro]

Case is being argued at this moment, Gov just finished and Rahimi's side is now arguing.

Live tweets here now:

https://twitter.com/fourboxesdiner

 

[VinnieBoomBah]

Reuters says I have reached my free article limit, so here is what looks to be the same story not behind a paywall

US Supreme Court hears arguments over domestic-violence gun curbs

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday was hearing arguments on the legality of a federal law that makes it a crime for people under domestic violence restraining orders to have guns in the latest major case to test the willingness of its conservative majority to further expand...

news.yahoo.com

 

[VinnieBoomBah]

I've said it before and I'll say it again, any pro 2a decision that comes out of this court is only incidental to whatever the court is actually interested in and not because they have any strong 2a leanings
This report could be reading the mood of the court wrong, but I wouldn't bet on it

Live updates: Supreme Court oral arguments on Second Amendment gun rights

The Supreme Court will consider a section of federal law that bars an individual subject to a domestic violence restraining order from possessing a firearm. Follow here for the latest live news updates.

www.cnn.com

Justices seem inclined to side with Biden admin. on Second Amendment case involving domestic violence

Analysis from CNN's Ariane de Vogue

After roughly 100 minutes of oral arguments, the Supreme Court seemed poised Tuesday to rule in favor of a federal law that bars individuals subject to certain domestic violence restraining orders from possessing firearms, as it was used against a Texas man.
The case marked the first substantive Second Amendment case to come before the justices since they issued a landmark opinion last year expanding gun rights nationwide.
For more than an hour of arguments, the justices referred to that case with a majority of the court indicating that the law at issue falls comfortably within the nation's historical tradition of limiting Second Amendment rights when it comes to individuals who pose a danger to society.

 

[Oro]

I've said it before and I'll say it again, any pro 2a decision that comes out of this court is only incidental to whatever the court is actually interested in and not because they have any strong 2a leanings
This report could be reading the mood of the court wrong, but I wouldn't bet on it

….

If so, it would NOT be in any shape or form as currently practiced.

The court was very hostile to the idea civil cases could strip 2A rights (as is done now). Very likely this is a face-saving spin for the Biden junta, as any decision is far enough out to memory-hole this.

Remember, our current laws do not restrict 2A rights on whether someone is a danger. They do so on random sentencing guidelines for non-violent crimes, or even one-sided statements in non-criminal cases. The bar as-is will not stand.

 

[The Heretic]

Texas Man at Center of Supreme Court Case Says He No Longer Wants Guns

WASHINGTON — In a handwritten letter from jail, the man at the center of a major Supreme Court gun rights case to be heard Tuesday apologized for going down “a wrong path” and wrote that he would no longer carry a gun. “I will make sure for sure this time that when I finish my time being...

news.yahoo.com

 

[fredball]

The reason there are so many mass shooting's is because the Economy, the Country, the Fabric of this very nation and everything you cherish is going down the TOILET at a rapid rate. And psychos or people who are not playing with a full deck , or complete lunch or don't know if they are a man or woman are falling off the fence and want to take as many innocent people with them for they are Cowards that can't find the courage or strength to be a responsible Productive Citizen , There I said it

 

[The Heretic]

The Supreme Court’s Big Gun Case Was Humiliating for the Justices

Zackey Rahimi has not demonstrated an ability to safely possess firearms.

news.yahoo.com

 

[VinnieBoomBah]

The Supreme Court’s Big Gun Case Was Humiliating for the Justices

Zackey Rahimi has not demonstrated an ability to safely possess firearms.

news.yahoo.com

Good Lord, if that's the one they wanted to take all the way to SCOTUS, how bad must their Claudette Colvin have been?