Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 12,094
- Reactions
- 21,392
Kind of a personal preference thing imo. Both brands are built well, reliable, relatively easy to shoot accurately. If I were really into this sort of thing I might go with a s&w 41 despite the extra cost. Re the victory, love the feel and balance of that thing (not real fond of the looks) but I haven't shot it. I loved the looks of my mark iii ruger but I felt that was too boring for me personally.
What was the name of the old version s&w 22 that was optimized for a surpressor (barrel on bottom)? Maybe 422/622 or something? can't remember name. I recall reports of it being ammo sensitive though. Love the looks of the nickel long barrel version of that gun but have never shot it.
edit: found it. Here is 622 pic I recall seeing them for $400-$500 pre panic fwiw
What was the name of the old version s&w 22 that was optimized for a surpressor (barrel on bottom)? Maybe 422/622 or something? can't remember name. I recall reports of it being ammo sensitive though. Love the looks of the nickel long barrel version of that gun but have never shot it.
edit: found it. Here is 622 pic I recall seeing them for $400-$500 pre panic fwiw