Silver Supporter
- Messages
- 15,028
- Reactions
- 53,531
I'm contemplating a rifle that can shoot to a thousand yards. It's been a whopping long time since I've bought scope rings for a boltie, so I wanted to get some input on brands and models, especially considering a precision/tactical type of rifle.
Cartridge is 6.5 CM so recoil is mild, Scope is the Primary Arms 3-18 Apollo whose ACSS reticle is designed for a 140 grain 6.5 CM. Tube is 30mm, bell is 50mm +-. Still deciding on the actual riflels, top contenders are something in the Savage 110 Tactical series and the Tikka tactical, but that's another thread
.
Both rifles have picatinny rails mounted to the receiver. Thoughts on if I should go with those as the base or would it be better to remove the rail and go with different bases or would it even make a difference?
Also, any reason to go with steel over aluminum rings or vice versa? Weight isn't a huge factor. Steel should be stronger, more rigid less likely to strip, but I figure aluminum rings would expand and contract with temperature changes the same as the scope tube. Does is make an difference? Yup, overthinking things as always...
Cartridge is 6.5 CM so recoil is mild, Scope is the Primary Arms 3-18 Apollo whose ACSS reticle is designed for a 140 grain 6.5 CM. Tube is 30mm, bell is 50mm +-. Still deciding on the actual riflels, top contenders are something in the Savage 110 Tactical series and the Tikka tactical, but that's another thread
Both rifles have picatinny rails mounted to the receiver. Thoughts on if I should go with those as the base or would it be better to remove the rail and go with different bases or would it even make a difference?
Also, any reason to go with steel over aluminum rings or vice versa? Weight isn't a huge factor. Steel should be stronger, more rigid less likely to strip, but I figure aluminum rings would expand and contract with temperature changes the same as the scope tube. Does is make an difference? Yup, overthinking things as always...