- Messages
- 4,274
- Reactions
- 7,990
I have all the receipts for my mag purchases. But will that even matter after April 15th? Also, with no permit to purchase system, will dealers even be able to sell guns without that?
JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
Proof of purchase date
- Thread Starter OregonRider
- Start date
-
- Tags
- magazine ban
- Messages
- 7,599
- Reactions
- 20,194
Can you provide a citation for that statement? I am unable to find one. On the other hand, there are many references on line as to how they are used.
"States can provide specialized affirmative defenses that apply only to one crime. For instance, a state's mandatory child abuse reporting law might provide an affirmative defense if the mandatory reporter knew someone else reported the abuse."
From:
Affirmative Defenses in Criminal Cases
Learn about common affirmative defenses and how they work, such as self-defense, duress, necessity, and entrapment.
www.criminaldefenselawyer.com
- Messages
- 4,274
- Reactions
- 7,990
Or maybe an old Polaroid if you've got one…use film camera too, since digital cameras leave trace of date and location.
- Messages
- 5,159
- Reactions
- 12,171
OK but @Cavedweller 's post is a bit more persuasive than yours IMHO.
- Messages
- 5,159
- Reactions
- 12,171
Yeah, thats why I include the receipt that shows the date the newspaper was actually purchased which is going to be a whole lot harder to fabricate.
- Messages
- 5,159
- Reactions
- 12,171
Dates on Magazines don't prove you possessed them prior to the Ban. Love Ya' Man but Wise Up.
Ba dum tsssss
- Messages
- 41,431
- Reactions
- 144,502
Mine are photoed in situ next to THE ORIGINAL Kaiser Roll, so I'm covered against this nonsense.
- Messages
- 1,090
- Reactions
- 2,427
It would be better to just not have the law.
- Messages
- 21,337
- Reactions
- 39,634
This is patently wrong. If you possess a machine gun you got legally in 1967 it may be legal if certain conditions exist. Outside of that it's not legal just because you possess it.
Another example is under WA state law it's not legal to possess a SBS. If you can show you acquired it prior to 1994 and have a stamp then it's legal but outside of that it's not, even if you acquired it legally at the time.
Last Edited:
- Messages
- 21,337
- Reactions
- 39,634
Incorrect. There are many affirmative defense examples in long standing us law. For example if you shoot someone it's an affirmative defense if you can prove self defense. The bubblegumers are applying it to mag possession which is bubbleguming evil.
- Messages
- 15,859
- Reactions
- 37,995
We're still talking about this dumb sh!t?
Yes, you need to know the idiosyncrasies of Total Civilian Disarmament.
- Messages
- 4,274
- Reactions
- 7,990
The entire left coast sucks. I can't wait to move to a free state.
- Messages
- 4,274
- Reactions
- 7,990
We've let too many things that aren't normal or moral fester to become the new normal. Every abnormal group has been shoving their ideas down our throats for so long. I'm glad we finally have an administration that is rolling some of this stuff back, and pretty quickly too.
- Messages
- 21,571
- Reactions
- 61,392
That's my story and I'm sticking to it. Prove it G man…I'm not sure that's true as "affirmative defense" is written into the law. Affirmative defense means you violated the law but you had a legit reason for doing so, such as "I purchased them before the ban." But you have to prove that.
"An affirmative defense is a defense in which the defendant introduces evidence, which, if found to be credible, will negate criminal liability or civil liability, even if it is proven that the defendant committed the alleged acts. The party raising the affirmative defense has the burden of proof on establishing that it applies."
HB 3075 reads:affirmative defense | Legal Information Institute
An affirmative defense is a defense in which the defendant introduces evidence, which, if found to be credible, will negate criminal liability or civil liability, even if it is proven thawww.law.cornell.edu
(5) [As of December 8, 2022, it shall be] It is an affirmative defense, as provided in ORS[166.055] 161.055, to the unlawful possession, use and transfer of a large-capacity magazine in this state by any person[, provided] that a)(A) The large-capacity magazine was owned by the person before December 8, 2022, and maintained in the person's control or possession; or[(b)] (B) The possession of a large-capacity magazine was obtained by a person who, on or after December 8, 2022, acquired possession of the large-capacity magazine by operation of law upon the death of a former owner who was in legal possession of the large-capacity magazine; etc. etc.
See (page 17):
1. What's a newspaper supposed to prove? I have an issue of a WW2-dated Life Magazine… if I take a picture of M1 carbine mags next to it, would that somehow prove they were originally acquired in 1942? It's easy to find old periodicals from whatever date you wish.
2. The "I'm gonna be soooo compliant there's no way they'll find fault with me" attitude is pretty silly.
2. The "I'm gonna be soooo compliant there's no way they'll find fault with me" attitude is pretty silly.
- Messages
- 21,571
- Reactions
- 61,392
Matters not to me, If I am forced to prove anything, they will get copies. NSOMN
Member 45541
- Messages
- 5,181
- Reactions
- 16,252
Agree! As long as one owns a firearm or believes in the right to own, they will find fault in something! ($%@T scumbags!
)
Upcoming Events
Central Wyoming Machine Gun And Cannon Shoot
- Laramie, WY
Ladies only beginning trap shooting
- Albany, OR
Classic Sportsman Gun & Knife Show
- Monroe, WA
New Classified Ads
-
Remington 1100 semi auto, has a release trigger.- Started by virginia73
- Replies: 0
-
-
17/19x/45 w/ TLR1 Light bearing holster - GCODE SOC RIG with RTI Hanger- Started by Gunbuggy
- Replies: 0
-
-
-
-
-
-