To simplify what I would like to see:
1. The Attractive Nuisance law should ONLY pertain to children (i.e. under 12 years of age) and for those not involved in a crime. (i.e. trespassing does not count, but if a 12 year old is breaking in to still or vandalize, screw the kid if he gets hurt).
2. The "Duty to Retreat" needs to go away like a fart-in-the-wind, BUT ONLY INSIDE ONES OWN HOUSE!
3. A home owner should have the right to protect their home and family with no fear of repercussions, even with deadly force. This needs to be only inside the home. There is NO need to shoot someone which is in your yard!
I do believe in the attractive nuisance law, it does however needs to be looked over and re-written. It is the verbiage which allows scums-bags to take advantage of the law.... But YES a person does deserve to pay if their negligence allowed a small child to get hurt!!!
Final Story for me and I am out of this conversation... It just seems that most people are incapable of seeing any other view except their own, which if you read, closely follow their own agendas?
1. The Attractive Nuisance law should ONLY pertain to children (i.e. under 12 years of age) and for those not involved in a crime. (i.e. trespassing does not count, but if a 12 year old is breaking in to still or vandalize, screw the kid if he gets hurt).
2. The "Duty to Retreat" needs to go away like a fart-in-the-wind, BUT ONLY INSIDE ONES OWN HOUSE!
3. A home owner should have the right to protect their home and family with no fear of repercussions, even with deadly force. This needs to be only inside the home. There is NO need to shoot someone which is in your yard!
I do believe in the attractive nuisance law, it does however needs to be looked over and re-written. It is the verbiage which allows scums-bags to take advantage of the law.... But YES a person does deserve to pay if their negligence allowed a small child to get hurt!!!
Final Story for me and I am out of this conversation... It just seems that most people are incapable of seeing any other view except their own, which if you read, closely follow their own agendas?