- Messages
- 38
- Reactions
- 22
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The police will come for their gun or magazines? There must be a mistake.
Haven't we heard that the majority of the LEOs are Pro-2nd Amendment and Pro-Constitution? They would not really enforce the anti-2nd and anti-Constitution laws now would they?
Not in NYC. Most people there, including the LEO's are NOT pro-freedom or pro U.S. Constitution in general.
Given that NYC is a leftist sewer and the center of bankster cartel, why were we so ticked off at Al-Quida for taking down the very buildings that house these bansters?
Well they missed that one too as SCOTUS says it's an individual right to own guns.The Center for American Progress released a report in April linking states with 'weak' gun laws and a high level of gun violence.
The Second Amendment, says, "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
Gun advocates interpret that to mean individuals have the right to possess guns, while those opposed say the law is antiquated and its misinterpretation puts Americans in danger.
Well they missed that one too as SCOTUS says it's an individual right to own guns.
Deen
BTW, The Constitution of The United States of America and The Bill of Rights mean squat when any state, county or city can regulate your rights away.
Most of the voting population seem to like it that way,,Obama 2016!!And that is called, TYRANNY.
Most of the voting population seem to like it that way,,Obama 2016!!
Gandhi practiced what he preached, even when violently attacked. His autobiography contains an account of such an incident that occurred during a trip to South Africa. Gandhi was traveling on a ship from India to Natal province with 800 other passengers, including his family. Racial discrimination in the province was rampant. Once white residents learned that Gandhi was aboard the ship, they became furious. They accused him of denouncing Natal whites while he was in India and bringing Indian immigrants to settle in the province as provocation.
Gandhi was innocent of both charges, but the residents attacked him when he disembarked from the ship anyway. He was hit with punches, kicks, stones and bricks, but refused to retaliate and simply kept walking (to the best of his ability). The mob was subdued only when the wife of the town's police superintendent opened her parasol and stood between Gandhi and the mob.
Really? What did Gandi himself write in his Autobiography?
"Among the many misdeeds of British rule in India, history will look upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest."- Gandhi And, yes I've read this quote In Context. Nonetheless, the point being made is that Indians would be bearing arms.
The quote comes from an autobiography by Gandhi, entitled "Mohandas Gandhi, an Autobiography." On page 446.
HERE: <broken link removed>
And, this:
"Hence also do I advocate training in arms for those who believe in the method of violence. I would rather have India resort to arms in order to defend her honor than that she should in a cowardly manner become or remain a helpless witness to her own dishonor," Gandhi wrote in his work The Doctrine of the Sword.
Gandhi knew all too well the value of a people who could defend themselves be it strictly on their own behalf, or fighting side by side WITH the British Empire, at that time.
Nonetheless, if it makes you feel much better, please remove Gandhi's photo from that line up in your mind's eye and still, what do you have??
Which begs the question... What's you point?
So take Gandhi out of the picture and still, what do you have?
Well, now your in my territory. Stalin enforced a no gun policy, (except for his henchman) plain and simple.
Having not only had a grandfather who was an officer in the Imperial Guard, pre-revolution and during the revolution, but also family who were shot in the back of the heads, and left in the dirt many years later, and some who (we think) rotted to death in the Gulags, and I can tell you that when you state, "without being forcefully disarmed" you're a bit full of crap, and you most likely know that. Forcefully? Considering that Stalin was murdering his fellow Russians by the millions (millions more than Hitler), and you did not know if your neighbor, or even your best buddy from childhood would turn you in, there really wasn't much need for force, now was there?
Just what is your point?
Well, now your in my territory. Stalin enforced a Communist no gun policy, (except for his henchman) plain and simple. And, what is your point?
Having not only had a grandfather who was an officer in the Imperial Guard, pre-revolution (and many relatives who owned guns at that time) and during the revolution, but also family who were shot in the back of the heads, and left in the dirt many years later, and some who (we think) rotted to death in the Gulags, and I can tell you that when you state, "without being forcefully disarmed", and you most likely know that. Forcefully? Considering that Stalin was murdering his fellow Russians by the millions (millions more than Hitler), and you did not know if your neighbor, or even your best buddy from childhood would turn you in, there really wasn't much need for force, now was there?
Just what is your point? You seem to be dancing around what you really want to state.
Most of the voting population seem to like it that way,,Obama 2016!!