JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
Messages
17,470
Reactions
36,503
Mance v. Whitaker.

Story here: Supreme Court Should Clarify Second Amendment Test



Holder was the AJ when this started. Whitaker is current ACTING AJ (which has some up in arms, where is that permitted under the law, Trump argues Obama policies established the precedent )

Ultimately this is Mance v USA.

Mance lives in the District, so why Texas is involved, other than court shopping is mysterious to me.



See earlier NWFA Post about Mance v Holder
NRA-ILA GRASSROOTS VOLUME 22, NUMBER 6 Current National News
Federal Court Holds Ban on Interstate Transfer of Handguns Unconstitutional
On Wednesday, Judge Reed O'Conner of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued an opinion and order in Mance v. Holder, ....
 
Mance v. Whitaker.

Story here: Supreme Court Should Clarify Second Amendment Test



Holder was the AJ when this started. Whitaker is current ACTING AJ (which has some up in arms, where is that permitted under the law, Trump argues Obama policies established the precedent )

Ultimately this is Mance v USA.

Mance lives in the District, so why Texas is involved, other than court shopping is mysterious to me.



See earlier NWFA Post about Mance v Holder
NRA-ILA GRASSROOTS VOLUME 22, NUMBER 6 Current National News

The plaintiffs tried to purchase a gun through a Texas dealer. That's what brings Texas into it...thank God.
 
Basically, the plaintiffs want to buy a handgun. There are no dealers in DC that keep them in stock. They attempted to get one out of the District to have sent home and it was no dice because DC banned interstate transfers.
 

Upcoming Events

Back Top