JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
Messages
3,184
Reactions
7,005
Kamala Harris livestreamed a campaign "informercial" with Oprah Winfrey Sept. 19th. At one point, they set up a anti-gun sequence described here by the New York Times:

"...began with the kind of emotional set piece that has become a grim go-to for Democrats campaigning on gun safety.

There was a video about the terror of a school shooting. A teenage gunshot victim in the audience with bandages on her wrist and arm. Her tearful mother speaking directly to Harris and imploring those in power to make a change."

Oprah then changed the subject to Harris' own gun ownership, a point she made at the debate with Trump, and which seems to be calculated effort to defuse the Gun Control issue with uncommitted voters. Harris responded with "If someone breaks into my house, they're getting shot." Followed by her usual giggling.

Oprah tried to do damage control by saying "I hear that, I hear that." Harris then blurted out that she "probably shouldn't have said that." "My aides will deal with that later." Then she got back on track and went to her rehearsed campaign line "I'm not trying to take everyone's guns away."

Given Harris' history on gun control and wielding the power of the State, her current gun control stand appears to be just a (ploy, lie, trick, -pick your term) to mislead uncommitted voters.

When you watch Harris, pay attention to the words she uses in her confused "word salad" answers. In my opinion, these words bubble up from her memory, and the ones she is most familiar with come to the front of the line. Things like "children of the community" which appears from her context to mean that children are not raised by their parents, but by the government. "What can be unburdened by what has been" when Harris claims to be the agent of change is very telling. It implies that the past has to be discarded in order to accept her vision of the future. This is a remarkable resemblance to the thinking of Pol Pot, whose unburdening the population of Cambodia resulted in the death of over 1.7 million people who were considered "Old People" who were unable to accept his new, socialist, vision.

I call her "The Giggler," a sort of Batman villainess, whose tittering hides a deeper evil.

Don't be fooled. She will come for the guns of anyone who doesn't support her vision for a new America.


NYT article here: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/20/us/politics/kamala-harris-gun-oprah.html
 
She (Harris) epitomizes everything the anti gun, power hungry elite say and do. They typical "rules for thee, not me" mentality, "weapons of war", only if they're in the hands of the lawful armed citizens whereas if those same guns are in the hands of the gooberment, they are "tools" or whatever terms they use.
They can say all the "gobble-deegook" they want, they need to stay away from our guns. It's clear they hate you, being free Americans with the power to keep a check on gooberment power, aka the 2A.
 
When you watch Harris, pay attention to the words she uses in her confused "word salad" answers. In my opinion, these words bubble up from her memory, and the ones she is most familiar with come to the front of the line.
This seems to me at least , from my experiences , true of all of those who are anti-gun , when I have talked to them about firearms and firearm ownership.
If...and that is such a little word with such big implications....
If the anti-gun person seems genuinely interested in learning , I then ask them to explain their "word salad" / trendy catch phrase terms and answers.
Clarifying questions can be helpful here....again only if the anti-gun person is actually open to hearing and considering a different viewpoint.

With all that said....
That anti-gun person who is actually open to hearing and considering a different viewpoint seems rare at best...and definitely not running for office.
Andy
 
When you watch Harris, pay attention to the words she uses in her confused "word salad" answers. In my opinion, these words bubble up from her memory, and the ones she is most familiar with come to the front of the line. Things like "children of the community" which appears from her context to mean that children are not raised by their parents, but by the government. "What can be unburdened by what has been" when Harris claims to be the agent of change is very telling. It implies that the past has to be discarded in order to accept her vision of the future. This is a remarkable resemblance to the thinking of Pol Pot, whose unburdening the population of Cambodia resulted in the death of over 1.7 million people who were considered "Old People" who were unable to accept his new, socialist, vision.
Well that earns the drama merit badge.

Kamala is like Pol Pot. :s0140:
 
"What can be unburdened by what has been" when Harris claims to be the agent of change is very telling. It implies that the past has to be discarded in order to accept her vision of the future. This is a remarkable resemblance to the thinking of Pol Pot, whose unburdening the population of Cambodia resulted in the death of over 1.7 million people who were considered "Old People" who were unable to accept his new, socialist, vision.

I call her "The Giggler," a sort of Batman villainess, whose tittering hides a deeper evil.

Don't be fooled. She will come for the guns of anyone who doesn't support her vision for a new America.


NYT article here: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/20/us/politics/kamala-harris-gun-oprah.html
While there is not a direct translation, the concept was really initiated by Marx...which makes sense as Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge were well versed in Marxist ideology.

As for the nut job Kamala, I generally refer to her as, "Heels Up Harris," as it accurately describes her rise to power. :cool:
 
While there is not a direct translation, the concept was really initiated by Marx...which makes sense as Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge were well versed in Marxist ideology.

As for the nut job Kamala, I generally refer to her as, "Heels Up Harris," as it accurately describes her rise to power. :cool:
Tell me about how "What can be unburdened by what has been" comes from Marx.
 
I guess when they wear sportcoats they are more legit. But regardless, this is some of the saddest fear bait I have seen in a while… and why spend the time producing something a bit slicker and restrained, when nonsense about pet eating immigrants is so much easier to repeatedly spew, to the same effect?


Trump will take away your guns too, as soon as he is done with you.
 
Kamala Harris livestreamed a campaign "informercial" with Oprah Winfrey Sept. 19th. At one point, they set up a anti-gun sequence described here by the New York Times:

"...began with the kind of emotional set piece that has become a grim go-to for Democrats campaigning on gun safety.

There was a video about the terror of a school shooting. A teenage gunshot victim in the audience with bandages on her wrist and arm. Her tearful mother speaking directly to Harris and imploring those in power to make a change."

Oprah then changed the subject to Harris' own gun ownership, a point she made at the debate with Trump, and which seems to be calculated effort to defuse the Gun Control issue with uncommitted voters. Harris responded with "If someone breaks into my house, they're getting shot." Followed by her usual giggling.

Oprah tried to do damage control by saying "I hear that, I hear that." Harris then blurted out that she "probably shouldn't have said that." "My aides will deal with that later." Then she got back on track and went to her rehearsed campaign line "I'm not trying to take everyone's guns away."

Given Harris' history on gun control and wielding the power of the State, her current gun control stand appears to be just a (ploy, lie, trick, -pick your term) to mislead uncommitted voters.

When you watch Harris, pay attention to the words she uses in her confused "word salad" answers. In my opinion, these words bubble up from her memory, and the ones she is most familiar with come to the front of the line. Things like "children of the community" which appears from her context to mean that children are not raised by their parents, but by the government. "What can be unburdened by what has been" when Harris claims to be the agent of change is very telling. It implies that the past has to be discarded in order to accept her vision of the future. This is a remarkable resemblance to the thinking of Pol Pot, whose unburdening the population of Cambodia resulted in the death of over 1.7 million people who were considered "Old People" who were unable to accept his new, socialist, vision.

I call her "The Giggler," a sort of Batman villainess, whose tittering hides a deeper evil.

Don't be fooled. She will come for the guns of anyone who doesn't support her vision for a new America.


NYT article here: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/20/us/politics/kamala-harris-gun-oprah.html
Makes me sick.
 

Upcoming Events

Subsonic Rifle Match
  • Eugene, OR
Roseburg Rod and Gun Club Gun Show
  • Roseburg, OR
Redmond Gun Show
  • Redmond, OR

New Classified Ads

Back Top