Gold Supporter
- Messages
- 25,162
- Reactions
- 38,344
Imagine you were on a jury for a case where you believe the defendant was guilty of violating a law that you felt was unconstitutional.
Would you have voted not guilty or would you accept that your duty on the jury was only to decide whether a defendant was guilty of violating the law, no matter how unconstitutional you felt the law was?
Would you have voted not guilty or would you accept that your duty on the jury was only to decide whether a defendant was guilty of violating the law, no matter how unconstitutional you felt the law was?