Hillary Says Supreme Court Is ‘Wrong’ on Second Amendment

[timac]

She hates the common persons freedoms and will destroy what remain. Are you prepared for when she is elected?

http://freebeacon.com/politics/leaked-audio-clinton-says-supreme-court-is-wrong-on-second-amendment/

Read More

 

[ZigZagZeke]

Taking a close look at Sanders' gun record, he's a mixed bag, but still light years ahead of Clinton.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ate-for-president-opposes-strict-gun-control/

 

[timac]

Taking a close look at Sanders' gun record, he's a mixed bag, but still light years ahead of Clinton.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ate-for-president-opposes-strict-gun-control/

Neither would be good for the country.

 

[308]

So, if a pathological liar says someone else is wrong, who should I believe?

 

[The Heretic]

The SCOTUS is wrong on most of its Second Amendment decisions.

But not the way Hillary states.

If the SCOTUS would look at the history it wouldn't allow about 99.9% of the gun laws on the books to stand and declare them unconstitutional.

 

[Stand Up]

Do everything you can to influence and educate people on constitution. The second amendment is the only amendment that make all the others possible!

 

[USMC-03]

Term limits for SCOTUS would go a long way toward making the views of Hillary and her ilk largely irrelevant.

 

[The Heretic]

Term limits for SCOTUS would go a long way toward making the views of Hillary and her ilk largely irrelevant.

Unfortunately that would let each president fill the seats on the court more often.

I do think that maybe 12 years or more would probably be reasonable though.

 

[USMC-03]

I do think that maybe 12 years or more would probably be reasonable though.

My thought is one term of 18 years with one justice replaced every two year, but the main objective is preventing activists from sitting there decade after decade.

I think it would also be a huge benefit to temper the court with a veto of SCOTUS rulings for both Congress and the States.

 

[oknow]

Term limits for SCOTUS would go a long way toward making the views of Hillary and her ilk largely irrelevant.

Term limits and
They should not be able to sit on the scotus beyond the age of 70 or in the senate.

 

[misterarman]

She hates the common persons freedoms and will destroy what remain. Are you prepared for when she is elected?

http://freebeacon.com/politics/leaked-audio-clinton-says-supreme-court-is-wrong-on-second-amendment/

Couldn't agree more with the first sentence.
In answer to the question, No.
My only question is will it be an out right ban or will presently owned firearms be "grandfathered" in?

 

[timac]

Couldn't agree more with the first sentence.
In answer to the question, No.
My only question is will it be an out right ban or will presently owned firearms be "grandfathered" in?

I'm sure she would try to ban most firearms, including the high powered sniper rifle (hunting rifle). She already embraces Australia and Britain gun confiscations.

 

[PaulB47]

Neither would be good for the country.

Nor would any R candidate be.

You guys still seem to think RKBA depends on old men wearing black dresses. This is amazing to me. What, are you going to hand 'em over if Hillary tells you to? Then what good are you?

Worried about revolution? Don't worry, that's already baked into the cake. And it will be over money, not guns (at first).

 

[nammac]

Make no mistake, Hiltery will indeed come for them, wouldn't expect much to be grandfathered...

Would expect the UN Small Arms Treaty to also become a reality under her leadership...

And I would expect to wake up to the acarid smell of burned gun powder most mornings as the modern day Union fights it's governmental leadership, again, over taxes and of course coming for our arms, again...

Nothing is ever learned from history by the elite class...

 

[DeanfromOregon]

Not to be picky, but IMHO if you call them elite you have already conceded, my friend.


e·lite
əˈlēt,āˈlēt/
noun
noun: elite; plural noun: elites

1. 1.
   a select part of a group that is superior to the rest in terms of ability or qualities.

 

[etrain16]

Nor would any R candidate be.

You guys still seem to think RKBA depends on old men wearing black dresses. This is amazing to me. What, are you going to hand 'em over if Hillary tells you to? Then what good are you?

Worried about revolution? Don't worry, that's already baked into the cake. And it will be over money, not guns (at first).

I don't think there are enough people in this country that care about their RKBA to start any kind of revolution. Too many folks have been brainwashed to believe guns in the hands of the 'common' man is simply too dangerous, and they are all to happy to hand that authority over to the government. Heck, it's happened over and over throughout history and very few have ever done anything about it. I really am not sure if it's still anywhere in the heart of the American people.

Now, if you really want to start a revolt, cut off the internet for 24, 48 hours. And I mean completely shut it down. No frickin' Facebook, no Instagram, no Twitter - all social media, all streaming services, all businesses - off. It would be mayhem on an unimaginable level. People can't live without their internet connections, in fact, I don't think many could even function. Commerce would shut down. People wouldn't even know what to eat without seeing a photo of what their friends ate the night before.

Nope, want to start a revolution, hit the kill switch. Then when the melee starts, the gun owners can step in to put things back in order.

 

[v0lcom13sn0w]

The Second Ammendment makes all others possible.

Come and take them. See what happens.

 

[nammac]

I don't think there are enough people in this country that care about their RKBA to start any kind of revolution. Too many folks have been brainwashed to believe guns in the hands of the 'common' man is simply too dangerous, and they are all to happy to hand that authority over to the government. Heck, it's happened over and over throughout history and very few have ever done anything about it. I really am not sure if it's still anywhere in the heart of the American people.

Now, if you really want to start a revolt, cut off the internet for 24, 48 hours. And I mean completely shut it down. No frickin' Facebook, no Instagram, no Twitter - all social media, all streaming services, all businesses - off. It would be mayhem on an unimaginable level. People can't live without their internet connections, in fact, I don't think many could even function. Commerce would shut down. People wouldn't even know what to eat without seeing a photo of what their friends ate the night before.

Nope, want to start a revolution, hit the kill switch. Then when the melee starts, the gun owners can step in to put things back in order.

Yessir, that's what really makes us tick now. Shut down the World Wide Web for 48 or 72 hours and that would create anarchy...

Funny, give us little electronic devices to consume our time and be our entertainment, then suddenly we can't live without them. They in effect become our Masters...

And everything outside that little electronic realm has no value or meaning. Not the election, not the SCOTUS, not the Constitution...

Perhaps, we as the American People, are more sheepish and controllable than I had thought...

Those who are not influenced or controlled by their little electronic devices are perhaps the older generation(s), which are dying off...

The future looks pretty bleak, no?

 

[Slobray]

Nope, want to start a revolution, hit the kill switch. Then when the melee starts, the gun owners can step in to put things back in order.

I'm ready, when do we start?


Ray

 

[misterarman]

I don't think there are enough people in this country that care about their RKBA to start any kind of revolution. Too many folks have been brainwashed to believe guns in the hands of the 'common' man is simply too dangerous, and they are all to happy to hand that authority over to the government. Heck, it's happened over and over throughout history and very few have ever done anything about it. I really am not sure if it's still anywhere in the heart of the American people.

Now, if you really want to start a revolt, cut off the internet for 24, 48 hours. And I mean completely shut it down. No frickin' Facebook, no Instagram, no Twitter - all social media, all streaming services, all businesses - off. It would be mayhem on an unimaginable level. People can't live without their internet connections, in fact, I don't think many could even function. Commerce would shut down. People wouldn't even know what to eat without seeing a photo of what their friends ate the night before.

Nope, want to start a revolution, hit the kill switch. Then when the melee starts, the gun owners can step in to put things back in order.

What? No NWFA.
I stopped smoking, drinking and have to UA for work.
I gotta have something.
I did Uninstall Facebook off my phone recently and don't miss it. Only started it to get updates from powder valley and after millions of hours of wasted productivity realized it had to go.