JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
Just some poor setups.

PSA Jakl pistol 556 green dot, co-witness, light/laser 1000lumen and suppressed.

Basic AR10 308 as a battle rifle, setup with scout scope and offset red dot...

Basic AR10 308 scoped, suppressed...

Bolt action 300 win mag...

Single shot bolt action 50bmg...

Dont want to be one to run around up close, I'll keep my distance...

However, bolt action 300bo suppressed with subs and lpvo.

22lr bolt action and semi suppressed with nail out of boards at 50yds and subs...
 
Last Edited:
All of my ARs can be used for combat. They don't have select-fire triggers though.

The one that is most likely to be a "range toy/hunting" is the green 6.5 Grendel 12" SBR, but it also would be good for urban.
The two 16" carbines, both are simple/lightweight. All 4 ARs have reliable iron sights, the M4 flat top having Matech rear BUIS. Two, maybe three have full weight bolt carriers. I'll have to look at all of them to confirm when I can. The 20" HBAR has chrome lined barrel, while the rest are CMV I think, but it just means need to pay more attention to cleaning their bores and chambers. IMG_20250211_095808.jpg
 
I get that any gun can be used in combat but thats not the subject....
I'm curious to see how many people here have actually bought or built a gun specifically for combat. It's mainly an AR topic but I wanted to open it up for anyone, as long as the specific purpose of your gun is for combat. .
So just because the tool someone has access to or uses doesn't fit the "bill" of the OP it should be disqualified? If you come to war with an AR and I can kill you with a rock because I have better tactics what is the point?
....Seems backwards to me.
Didn't Rambo use a bow & knife. Everyone knows that's for reals.
The preferred method for a Filipino GI to dispatch a Japanese soldier was a Bolo, just sayin, PAX
 
I have purchased, assembled, or had rifles assembled that resemble those used in combat.
No clones though, and none purposely built for combat. At this point in life, I am a man of leisure shooting.

Here is one of my leisure shooting combat-inspired rifles...(that I wouldn't attempt to pack around these days).

It is a Springfield Armory M1A with a medium contour Smith Enterprise Ic. 22" Crazy Horse 1:10" twist barrel, mounted in a Sage International EBR chassis, G & G Firearms & Supplies faux lock-out selector, Sage optic mount, Leupold rings on a NF NX8. Knights bipod mount with a Harris 1A2-L2 attached.

trio_sages.jpg
Apologies to everyone who has viewed the photo multiple times.

The one in the center is also combat-inspired. It is a Springfield M1A Bush Rifle (18" barrel) that still sits as shown in the photo. At some point it will have an NF LPVO mounted in Badger rings.

Edit to add the negatives: These two examples are heavy and they do not suppress well, they magazines are not common among many nations (NATO or other), etc.

I sincerely hope that the citizens of this great nation will never again have to resort to armed combat within its borders.
 
Last Edited:
The ONE to Rule them ALL!
1747418848977.png
I'm far more comfortable with this then any/all others, and she converts to a DMR when the need arises, plenty rifle enough to meet ones fate head on if it ever comes to it!
It's never really the rifle, it's the Nut behind the Butt that counts, the skill and willingness to use it when needed, and to accept what comes after bullets meet flesh!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yup with a whole lot of flash. Less than ideal.

Flash suppression is important.
Then there's the option of selling it and doing a new build, which is something I've been pondering. It would be an AR10 long range set up though. Personally it's either one or the other but I know I'll never change anything on this build...except adding an ambidextrous Radian charging handle maybe. It's exactly what I envisioned at the beginning and 100% what I wanted to build for my specific purposes. I'm gonna cry if I sell it probably lol.
 
A flash suppressor absolutely. Agree I would never put a comp on a combat rifle.
This is what AI says about that and it makes perfect sense to me:

Whether or not to put a compensator on a combat rifle depends on the specific needs and priorities of the user and the intended application of the rifle.

Here's a breakdown of the pros and cons to help you decide:

Pros of using a compensator on a combat rifle:
Reduced muzzle rise: Compensators redirect gases upwards, pushing the muzzle down and keeping it more level during firing. This allows for faster and more accurate follow-up shots, especially in rapid-fire situations.
Improved controllability: By mitigating muzzle rise, a compensator makes the rifle easier to control, particularly when firing multiple shots in succession.
Enhanced shooting comfort: Less muzzle rise can lead to a more comfortable shooting experience, especially with higher-powered rifles.
Faster target acquisition: Reduced muzzle flip makes it easier to reacquire the target after each shot, allowing for quicker engagement of multiple targets.

Cons of using a compensator on a combat rifle:
Increased noise and concussion: Compensators redirect gases, which can result in a louder muzzle blast, potentially affecting the shooter and those nearby.
Potential for increased muzzle flash: Some compensators can increase muzzle flash, which could be a disadvantage in low-light conditions or when trying to conceal your position.
Added weight and length: Compensators add extra weight and length to the rifle, potentially impacting maneuverability and handling in confined spaces.
Cost: Compensators are an added expense and may require a threaded barrel for installation.
 
The ONE to Rule them ALL!
View attachment 2093596
I'm far more comfortable with this then any/all others, and she converts to a DMR when the need arises, plenty rifle enough to meet ones fate head on if it ever comes to it!
It's never really the rifle, it's the Nut behind the Butt ( Or, Ni&^$ er on the Trigger) that counts, the skill and willingness to use it when needed, and to accept what comes after bullets meet flesh!
As an aded bonus, you can use it to pole-vault over partition walls and creek-beds with that smoke-pole!

;) :D
 
This is what AI says about that and it makes perfect sense to me:
There's no way I can take anything AI seriously about whats needed in combat. There are members in this forum that have been in combat, some in this thread that would be the people to ask whats needed on a combat rifle.
 
There's no way I can take anything AI seriously about whats needed in combat. There are members in this forum that have been in combat, some in this thread that would be the people to ask whats needed on a combat rifle.
So what your missing the whole point. AI is telling nothing but truth and there's nothing about it that can be denied or debated. Why would listen to someone else when our specific application and desires are different... and don't forget it's a rifle that I own and use so obviously I would know if I like it and would like it in combat. AI is actually where the good sense is coming from on this subject. Don't dig yourself a bigger hole now, be careful how you respond to that lol.
 
Every GrOOOp needs a BLOOOP in their TrOOOp...
ui_bloop.jpg
...this is a Colt AR15 with a 14.5' SOCOM profile barrel with a pin-welded flash hider, an LMT M2blo0op3 hanging low, and a ACOG riding high. B5 SOPMOD buttstock, HK magazine...there are some rails for mounting cool stuff that you can obtain by trading some them GNC sup's and a wrinkled and battle-worn issue of Maxim.

Don't get caught BLOOOPin' the wrong round... or you will become a flustered Star Cluster, Red in the face and eager to pop Smoke.

Like most of the things I am tinkering on, it isn't finished. Waiting on a certain quadrant sight to surface before moving any further.

Negatives: Packing the pyro-popper produces positive results only when provided provisions are periodically populated.

ui_beepboopbeep.png
 
Last Edited:
So what your missing the whole point. AI is telling nothing but truth and there's nothing about it that can be denied or debated. Why would listen to someone else when our specific application and desires are different... and don't forget it's a rifle that I own and use so obviously I would know if I like it and would like it in combat. AI is actually where the good sense is coming from on this subject. Don't dig yourself a bigger hole now, be careful how you respond to that lol.
You joined this forum yesterday. We don't need you to preach about how great AI is.
 
So what your missing the whole point. AI is telling nothing but truth and there's nothing about it that can be denied or debated. Why would listen to someone else when our specific application and desires are different... and don't forget it's a rifle that I own and use so obviously I would know if I like it and would like it in combat. AI is actually where the good sense is coming from on this subject. Don't dig yourself a bigger hole now, be careful how you respond to that lol.
I thought the point was a gun for combat?
If you like a compensator on your combat rifle thats ok but AI never stated if its better. I'm guessing most combat veterans want to reduce muzzle flash and 556 recoil is negligible.
 

Upcoming Events

New Classified Ads

Back Top