Bronze Lifetime
- Messages
- 4,940
- Reactions
- 13,030
The earliest repeating firearms (other than revolvers) typically had tube magazines, either in the butt stock or under the barrel. Early bolt actions of the 1880's and 1890's had blind magazines that were fed with a clip, either a charger or en-bloc. The "clip" was the thing that held the rounds together, to be inserted into the firearm.
Along comes the box magazine that serves the same function. It seems logical to me that people would call it the same thing, since it does the same thing, even if it's quite different.
My grandfather, a WWII vet, called his 1911 magazines "clips". I don't believe I ever heard him utter the word "magazine" unless it was reading material. He wasn't a weekend warrior, ignorant noob, or useless Hollywood producer.
I was told once that the real problem with this came about in WWII. We had M1 rifles that used en-bloc clips, and M1 carbines that used box magazines. Incorrect terminology- "Hey, send us some M1 clips!" -could result in a logistical nightmare, and dead GIs in foxholes with the wrong ammo.
Along comes the box magazine that serves the same function. It seems logical to me that people would call it the same thing, since it does the same thing, even if it's quite different.
My grandfather, a WWII vet, called his 1911 magazines "clips". I don't believe I ever heard him utter the word "magazine" unless it was reading material. He wasn't a weekend warrior, ignorant noob, or useless Hollywood producer.
I was told once that the real problem with this came about in WWII. We had M1 rifles that used en-bloc clips, and M1 carbines that used box magazines. Incorrect terminology- "Hey, send us some M1 clips!" -could result in a logistical nightmare, and dead GIs in foxholes with the wrong ammo.