Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No sir, FTF is now legal. The judge threw out the parts of GCA 68 forbidding FTF. You may now buy a handgun from anyone you like, anywhere you like and transport back into your home state.Are we reading the same thing?
FTF would still be a no go....all this means is you could buy a handgun from a dealer in another state just like you can rifles and shotguns now. Private interstate transactions aren't affected...( still not legal, which I di disagree with, FWIW )
The ruling has nothing to do with FTF sales.I will wait until the appeals work through, the legal beagles explain the ramifications, and the BATF changes their online FAQs to reflect the changes, etc.
But if FTF interstate is legal, then that would be cool - indeed, if it worked out that way, and Oregon didn't put in place a 594 like law, this would be a way for WA state citizens to get their guns down here instead? We'll see I guess.
I have my doubts about FTF interstate as the reasoning behind the challenge was based on the national background check system, and in most states a BGC is not required for non-FFL transfers.
You can drive to North Texas and buy from an FFL. This is the only district it applies to.
It will end there. There will be no appeal.
"This is a tremendous victory for the civil rights of Washington, D.C., residents and Americans in general — the court recognized there's no need to destroy the national market for handguns," said Alan Gura, who argued the case for the plaintiffs and is a founding partner at Gura & Possessky Pllc, in the District. "District residents are free to purchase handguns so long as they comply with D.C. law and have those handguns properly registered."
I will wait until the appeals work through, the legal beagles explain the ramifications, and the BATF changes their online FAQs to reflect the changes, etc.
But if FTF interstate is legal, then that would be cool - indeed, if it worked out that way, and Oregon didn't put in place a 594 like law, this would be a way for WA state citizens to get their guns down here instead? We'll see I guess.
I have my doubts about FTF interstate as the reasoning behind the challenge was based on the national background check system, and in most states a BGC is not required for non-FFL transfers.
I will give you all the moral support you need ..... unless you need it.I ya'll want to pay ALL my legal fees should anything go wrong, Ill be the Guinea pig
BATFE has not issued anything out to FFLs. I believe the ruling is stayed until DoJ's appeal is heard.Time to revive this thread - anyone heard anything since February about this? I've tried some searches online, but I'll be darned if I can find another word about this in recent weeks/months. Anyone heard anything? Are people buying freely across state lines now?