- Messages
- 1,432
- Reactions
- 1,307
in end of world economics it wont do you any good.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'd invest in the mining stock before I'd by the physical product. Just my opinion. Downside : Fake Gold, storage and weight. Then.....someone could just decide to rob you/kill you for what you have. Rrrrright......the police and the courts. Justice? LOL. But, that's really sort of another subject.
BUT......
View attachment 1052953
Besides....
View attachment 1052954
Aloha, Mark
You're wrong here. When silver was at $25/oz I took about 150 dollars, face value of pre-1964 dimes and quarters (90% silver) to a gold & silver shop.. I got enough to buy a PS90 plus ammo.Thanks for all the conversation. I think the reason he's been buying PMs this long is his distrust of government (I get it) and wanting to have something substantial in his hands. Heck, I remember when the Marks families in Spokane used to have money sewn into their sheets and stuffed in mattresses (probably still do, all those millions they got from the SCS raid screw-up) - but logistically it seems like it's going to be a pain to deal with down the road. It's not like any of it is likely to be tradeable for anything big, like a car, house, or fun NFA item.
What is the point?I found this real world example (posted one day ago) about one person's buying and selling Gold adventure. Perhaps, it might encourage or maybe it'll discourage the wanna be Gold Bugs out there.
Mind you that it's NOT even close to a SHTF situation.
Aloha, Mark
Too large of a unit to be liquid in any emergency situation, these are only for large holders whose large bars would rarely see the light of day. In fact, you'd have a difficult time selling it to any established gold dealer locally.So... that 350 ounce ingot will cost you (at the current price of $1627.74 per ounce) $569,709.00 plus whatever mark up the dealer demands.
As previously pointed out, not an equitable comparison using a pawn shop vice a gold store. But there is always a spread between buy and sell.I found this real world example (posted one day ago) about one person's buying and selling Gold adventure.
I may have already left some comments about this, above, or maybe in another thread.Reading through this thread again made me curious about the fake gold comments
"Thailand Rob." He's an American and lives in Thailand. He bought the gold in Thailand. And, he'll more than likely, end up selling the gold there. That bar of gold is for all comparison purposes, the same karat in Thailand as it will be in America.
I suspect that.......the vid was just to help people who may have been thinking about such "trading in gold".
YES, most of us here live in America. So well, good luck with your gold trading. That being said.......taking a $50 hit at the *pawn shop is your choice to make or you could shop for a better deal (if you wanted to). Oooops......OK, OK, ok........I forgot that some of you have "no problem" with paying the $50 for a transfer fees to exercise your RIGHT (say, when buying a $150 .22 caliber rifle). So be it.
Then Note : the Gold price is set via the NY trading system. Hummmmm.......SHTF.......will they still be trading? Whatever.
Bottom line......it's your money and where or whatever you invest in, is your choice.
*If the American Jewelry Shop offered to buy the same gold with "only" a $40 hit, would that make it "better"? Not to mention that, the various shops may actually be on a percentage scale (for sales and/or trades), NOT on a flat fee. Whatever. On that concept too.
Aloha, Mark
Totally fair statement. As someone who has some PMs I just see it as better than Fiat currency printed out of thin air with no intrinsic value. Commonly used ammo, basic tools, food - all more practical in a true SHTF scenario.If you are coming to me in a SHTF situation to trade you'd better have more than PM's or jewelry to trade because they're worthless to me.
Who has "no problem" paying transfer fees here in Washington? What choice do people have that would allow them to not pay these fees?"Thailand Rob." He's an American and lives in Thailand. He bought the gold in Thailand. And, he'll more than likely, end up selling the gold there. That bar of gold is for all comparison purposes, the same karat in Thailand as it will be in America.
I suspect that.......the vid was just to help people who may have been thinking about such "trading in gold".
YES, most of us here live in America. So well, good luck with your gold trading. That being said.......taking a $50 hit at the *pawn shop is your choice to make or you could shop for a better deal (if you wanted to). Oooops......OK, OK, ok........I forgot that some of you have "no problem" with paying the $50 for a transfer fees to exercise your RIGHT (say, when buying a $150 .22 caliber rifle). So be it.
Then Note : the Gold price is set via the NY trading system. Hummmmm.......SHTF.......will they still be trading? Whatever.
Bottom line......it's your money and where or whatever you invest in, is your choice.
*If the American Jewelry Shop offered to buy the same gold with "only" a $40 hit, would that make it "better"? Not to mention that, the various shops may actually be on a percentage scale (for sales and/or trades), NOT on a flat fee. Whatever. On that concept too.
Aloha, Mark
I suspect that Rich People have no problem with an extra $50 (or maybe even more). It's probably even considered as "chump change" to them.Who has "no problem" paying transfer fees here in Washington? What choice do people have that would allow them to not pay these fees?
How do you get around paying the fees for transferring a firearm here in Washington?
Yeah yeah I get all that. What you haven't addressed is: What other choices are there for someone to transfer a gun here in Washington? Don't complain about rich people. If I was a millionaire I would still resent paying for this but regardless of how I feel about it, I gotta pay. If I want to buy a gun from a complete stranger, I am not taking a chance on that guy being a loony or cop looking for a bust, so the transfer goes through an FFL. He isn't going to eat the cost of the transfer so again, What option do I have? If I want the gun I pay the FFL, and the FFL pays the state. I already donate hundreds of dollars each year to the SAF, GOA and NRA to fight these laws, but until they beat these laws in court, rich or poor, we all have to pay. If you have a way around that fact. I'm all ears.I suspect that Rich People have no problem with an extra $50 (or maybe even more). It's probably even considered as "chump change" to them.
++++++
Imagine......
Paying for a License........
To attend a house of worship.
To speak out at a public hearing about some controversial subject.
To create art that might be seen as objectionable.
To publish (or broadcast) a non-Govt approved point of view on any subject.
Etc...... Etc.......
+++++++
More about the fees......
The politicians and anti-gun voters were probably thinking:
1) Anyway, only the police and military should have guns.
2) What an easy way for the State to make money while putting up more barriers to gun ownership. Hey, if you can't afford it......you weren't worthy of gun ownership anyway.
3) It'll be easy to raise the fees in a couple of years. MO MONEY, Mo Money, mo money.......
4) Yeah.....the money could be used for supporting the homeless and illegals. Yeah.....a "redistribution of wealth".
5) It's not even a 2nd A issue. Because, it's actually a TAX. Just like the NFA fees.
6) It's about keeping people SAFE. Even keeping criminals SAFE too. #CLM= Criminal Lives Matter
7) Anyway.......anyone, who wants to own a gun is MENTALLY SICK. Like all those NRA Members and/or TRUMPY-NAZIs (aka: Republican Voters) etc..... etc......
8) Besides, people who like/want to own guns are "Mentally Sick People". Yup, we need to also protect them from themselves. It's all reasonable and common sense. They may not see it because they aren't reasonable nor exercising common sense. Yeah......"Mentally Sick People" shouldn't own guns.
I'm sure that most any anti-gun person could LOGICALLY (according to them) probably think of more reason(s) to thwart a good citizen(s) from exercising a RIGHT.
Rrrrrright........
Aloha, Mark