I'd say the primary point is that the dogs are creating a nuisance with their barking and this is affecting an immediate neighbor who is suffering because of it. You're acknowledging an awareness of recognized conditions that exasperate the effect.The primarily point is that the nuance neighbor admitted to his hyper sensory hearing while he has admitted to his mental illness and the wife mediates his complaints.
In the world of the lawyer; you take your victim as you find them. As in ... If you rear end a car with a Picasso in the back, guess what?!?
Free advice: Bark collars are effective. So is training the dogs. Together your neighbor can enjoy some peace.
