- Messages
- 32
- Reactions
- 26
Maybe he doesn't know anything about dogs,who knows but himself
But I know from watching 1000s of dogs over the years at dog parks. And stopping many fights. And pierce county is full of stupid 'pit owners' (notice stupid owners? No agenda) who make their dogs aggressive.
Or should I say let them keep aggressive.
I've watched older pits and I've watched younger pits and they mostly react the same when challenged. Of course the younger ones don't react as well and may get their a$$kicked. But the initial reaction is the same.
The dog was bred to be an aggressive dog.
Period. Fact you can look up.
Stafordshire terriers are one off dogs from pits. They are both developed with the same dogs save 1 or 2, out of about 7 total. ( just shiztz I read in dog breed books)
Both were bred to be aggressive breeds
Then you get some dumb a$$ who knows nothing about dogs and needs a pinile extension so he buys a pit
And yes I can pick the pits and the pit mixes,not very hard to do
Interesting that you say they were bred to be aggressive. They were known as "nanny dogs" from the 19th century through the 50's. My mother grew up with one on the farm in Iowa. Stubborn, but not aggressive. It was a Pit on all the WWI and WWII ads, it was a pit in "Our Gang", doesn't sound like they were recognized as aggressive until recently. Can they be? Yes, but that is mostly owners not doing their job. Big dogs are big dogs, and as I have said earlier, they do what they do for their own reasons. We went through this with German Shepherds, Rottweilers, and Dobies in the 60s and 70s. Now its pit bulls. Its not a breed issue, its an owner issue.