Carry ready meaning not a single malfunction whatsoever. My ftf reference is FIRE
I was at the range the other day and out of about a dozen mags I had one ftf, I'm very disappointed. I have a total now of 500 rounds through my 92 inox. It was with an eagle 17rd nickel magazine loaded with reloads. Strangely enough the same trip my G17 had a ftf with the same ammo and a non Glock mag, so I can't blame the ammo? The other previous ftf was with a factory 15rd mag and Remington flat nose factory rounds. That ftf was at approximately round 175 through her. I have never had a new 92 until now and 2 ftf are very disappointing. My old 92 beat and used never ever had any sort of issues with over 2500 rounds. So I'm hoping by the 1000 round count I will have complete reliability.
The gentleman I was with had a new khar .45 (not familiar so if I misspelled forgive ). He had darn near a falier rate of 1 to 1 ftf. I was shocked and sympathetic. I mean I was upset with my 92. Am I justified in being worried? Anyone care to flame the 92 or give past experience.
I was at the range the other day and out of about a dozen mags I had one ftf, I'm very disappointed. I have a total now of 500 rounds through my 92 inox. It was with an eagle 17rd nickel magazine loaded with reloads. Strangely enough the same trip my G17 had a ftf with the same ammo and a non Glock mag, so I can't blame the ammo? The other previous ftf was with a factory 15rd mag and Remington flat nose factory rounds. That ftf was at approximately round 175 through her. I have never had a new 92 until now and 2 ftf are very disappointing. My old 92 beat and used never ever had any sort of issues with over 2500 rounds. So I'm hoping by the 1000 round count I will have complete reliability.
The gentleman I was with had a new khar .45 (not familiar so if I misspelled forgive ). He had darn near a falier rate of 1 to 1 ftf. I was shocked and sympathetic. I mean I was upset with my 92. Am I justified in being worried? Anyone care to flame the 92 or give past experience.