JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
My CQB-16 Blackfeather build is nearing completion.

?oh=5bdb85f3890b0416b98817f8db1144eb&oe=54CCC35C&__gda__=1418847725_0af75d14c929585b09f70a43d97c0708
 
10648543_952188024798386_7051445100497976004_o.jpg

10712870_952188741464981_5881924514052166558_n.jpg?oh=c8e2bbe3e349aeff7c45378c2590952f&oe=54BCF9EB

Too much coffee in me at the time, but - First rounds fired!
I was in a rush so it's not my best effort, and I forgot to bring my group tightening Wind Talker.
All that being said - I am a happy Blackfeather owner.

?oh=78655e5a5ae17c8d261b87fefd88b320&oe=54CE2DEF&__gda__=1418630335_aa1bd384b5e82f29e17a418e0d77beaa
Indoor - 25 yard range
Top left: 5 rounds, off hand - rapid fire. Top center: 10 rounds from the rest - with optic adjustments. Top right: 10 rounds from the rest. Bottom center: 11 rounds from the rest.

Aimpoint Comp M4 with 2 MOA dot. Portuguese NATO surplus ammunition.

10679914_952154908135031_7622468459172862043_o.jpg

H2O-MAN.BFRS.JPG
 
Last Edited:
Weight is a factor.

The most common EBRs use the heaviest variant of the tried & true EBR chassis, the M14ALCS.
My M21 A5 EBR started out as an M14ALCS. I upgraded to the lighter PMRI/PRS2 butt stock.

The NSG "Dot Matrix" EBR pictured here with nothing but iron sights remains 7.2 oz. heavier than the Blackfeather CQB-16. The FDE Blackfeather CQB-16 is fitted with the LSP monolithic top rail, and a rather heavy optic/ring combo, plus a spacer, and it's still lighter than the basic M21 A5 EBR.

Not quite an apples to apples comparison, but you get my point.

7.2oz.JPG
 
As I have mentioned before, the Blackfeather RS is NOT iron sight friendly. It is designed for optics, and the monolithic LSP top rail is designed for AR style flip up iron sights. With that in mind, I have decided to try the new high butt stock adapter (HBA), and the Blackfeather rifle butt stock (RBS). This should eliminate the need for a cheek riser.

1969308_978357932181395_5550513778566256205_n.jpg
14023_978632642153924_1117031940878470317_n.jpg
 
OK, the <broken link removed> is back home on my full length M21 A5 EBR, and I have returned my CQB-16 to more of a Run & Gun configuration. I'm currently running an Aimpoint Comp M4, but I am considering an <broken link removed> EXPS3-0 on a 7mm riser mount. The current package weighs just 12 lbs. as pictured below including the 20 rounds of 7.62 NATO in the magazine. The balance is great with a weight bias toward the rear.

10300708_1009376699079518_9152346206985549302_n.jpg
10421216_1009376715746183_2218985666888783522_n.jpg
 
What happened to the M14 I trained on - I can understand why people like the new look / function but I am too much of a dinosaur to want to do that to mine. Its kind of like repackaging the 1911A1 to me there is no payoff.
 
depends on what you got accustomed to shooting first as well. I feel better with a pistol grip - it just feels right. I also second the fact that the accuracy is far superior to anything else I have used, including a professionally bedded McMillan.
 
Do you have any issues with your fingers riding up into that monstrous gap between the pistol grip and trigger guard? o_O

No issues, none, and the space does make it easier to R&R the trigger group.

Everybody notices the gap in pictures, but none of the users have any issues with it.
 
Last Edited:

Upcoming Events

Albany Gun Show
Albany, OR
Falcon Gun Show - Classic Gun & Knife Show
Stanwood, WA
Lakeview Spring Gun Show
Lakeview, OR
Teen Rifle 1 Class
Springfield, OR
Kids Firearm Safety 2 Class
Springfield, OR

New Resource Reviews

New Classified Ads

Back Top