Diamond Lifetime
- Messages
- 6,124
- Reactions
- 13,918
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You know, I did have a thought while reading his very well thought out piece.
If an individual were to acquire an 80% chunk of metal, and using a handheld drill motor or other tool, push the completion level of the chunk slightly past the 80% (such as by crudely drilling a hole in the middle of the receiver pocket,) then a gunsmith could theoretically complete the machining operations, since it's assumed he works primarily on what is considered to be firearms/receivers, which are past the 80% point by definition, correct?
Can you please explain to me why and how his "letter" is childish??? It seems pretty clear to me that he has done his research and is calling the BATFE out on a few things that they state in their letter. Why shouldn't he own/sell firearms? Wouldn't you want someone with a clear understanding of the laws to do business with? I would.....just sayn....Wow. Childish. This man is scarcely fit to own a gun, let alone sell them.
Well I can think of two reasons - the difficulty of delivering the mill to the new 'owner' and his potential lack of milling experience, or any mechanical experience for that matter.Well what is to stop the person with the milling machine from selling it to the guy for say a dollar?
These guns have NEVER been used in a crime.
Though I agree with almost everything in the post, we have to admit there is little -to no- data to support this "Only" hypothesis.The amount of money, effort and expertise involved in making a gun from an 80% lower is non-trivial and the ONLY people doing it are hobbyists who possess them completely legally.
Though I agree with almost everything in the post, we have to admit there is little -to no- data to support this "Only" hypothesis.