- Messages
- 7,381
- Reactions
- 19,890
Hopefully it gets struck down for the unconstitutional BS that it is, but a question I had is:
If you own firearms, bought them before 1639 went into effect, if they need to be sent back for warranty work, when they return them, have to be transferred through an FFL. Would that mean that to receive your firearm back you would need to present proof of completing their "safety course" within the past 5 years?
I already had an argument with an FFL recently who wanted to charge me another transfer fee for a firearm I had already paid a transfer fee on but had returned for warranty work, so I was curious how this would play out with 1639 and that safety class.
I read the entirety of 1639 before it passed, but didn't recall seeing anything about this.
If you own firearms, bought them before 1639 went into effect, if they need to be sent back for warranty work, when they return them, have to be transferred through an FFL. Would that mean that to receive your firearm back you would need to present proof of completing their "safety course" within the past 5 years?
I already had an argument with an FFL recently who wanted to charge me another transfer fee for a firearm I had already paid a transfer fee on but had returned for warranty work, so I was curious how this would play out with 1639 and that safety class.
I read the entirety of 1639 before it passed, but didn't recall seeing anything about this.