U.S. judge blocks New York from banning guns in church

[The Heretic]

U.S. judge blocks New York from banning guns in church

A federal judge on Thursday barred the state of New York, at least for now, from enforcing the part of a closely watched gun law that bans firearms from churches or other places of worship.

www.reuters.com

Read More

 

[Yarome]

Hehehehhheeee... Noice!!

Another thread pulled. Horsechow must be blowing a gasket. All I can say to her is:

 

[Yarome]

Wow! The judgement is long, but an excellent read. The judge literally rips NY's woketards a new one with some of the strongest language I've seen so far. A thing of beauty!

https://assets.nationbuilder.com/firearmspolicycoalition/pages/6619/attachments/original/1666301241/Hardaway_v_Nigrelli_Order_Granting_TRO.pdf?1666301241

 

[Stomper]

First of all, HTF would anyone know if I have a concealed weapon (aka pew) in church unless I drew it to take out a possessed pagan coming in with a gun to shoot some unarmed "fish in a barrel", and then they'd charge ME with violating the law after saving lives sitting in the pews? (Pew-pew life…. Get it? LOL)



Buncha GENIUSES sittin' in Albany, NY makin' this sheite up right there, I tell ya!

 

[CountryGent]

Violating a citizen's Second Amendment rights simply because they're exercising their First? Oh and at a type of gathering known to be targets of nutbags? Brilliant logic, New York!

Good on the judge blocking it.

 

[nammac]

Good on Judge Sinatra for understanding what the Second Amendment really means. Perhaps the scales are starting to fall from their eyes.

As for those politicians who continually commit treason, well there'll be lots of wailing and gnashing of teeth to come…

 

[Stomper]

Violating a citizen's Second Amendment rights simply because they're exercising their First? Oh and at a type of gathering known to be targets of nutbags? Brilliant logic, New York!

Good on the judge blocking it.

I agree, there's TONS of nutbags in churches, and they got bullseyes all over 'em!

 

[Lilhigbee]

In the first part of the decision, "Eight days after the Supreme Court...even more-restrictive legislation.." the judge seems to be acknowledging New York's contempt for the SCOTUS decision. The next step would be for SCOTUS to hold all that voted for this BS in contempt and put them in the pokey until the law is repealed. They have the means of enforcing personal responsibility for supporting these laws if they would just use it. The Supreme Court Police in conjunction with local authorities should round them up. And who would they appeal to??