- Messages
- 673
- Reactions
- 211
<broken link removed>
:huh: It is sad that It had to be involved in a case with a drug dealer that police could have found guilty doing old fashion police work. Instead, I have heard the FBI and LEO are saying that this should be totally legal with the economy being so bad and the limited resources police agencies have now days.
The first thing I thought of was the rights of gun owners. I wasn't alone, one of the groups against this is the Gun Owners of America.
Quoted from the article, "The government argues that people have no expectation of privacy concerning their travel on public streets."
Ok, we pay for public roads, and states have said in the past A Driver's liceanse is a privelige, but are our civil liberties a privelige as well. Come on, this is bubblegum. I consider myself a Liberal WITH Gun rights, but this ticks me off. Did I just wake up on the wrong side of the bed this morning?
:huh: It is sad that It had to be involved in a case with a drug dealer that police could have found guilty doing old fashion police work. Instead, I have heard the FBI and LEO are saying that this should be totally legal with the economy being so bad and the limited resources police agencies have now days.
The first thing I thought of was the rights of gun owners. I wasn't alone, one of the groups against this is the Gun Owners of America.
Quoted from the article, "The government argues that people have no expectation of privacy concerning their travel on public streets."
Ok, we pay for public roads, and states have said in the past A Driver's liceanse is a privelige, but are our civil liberties a privelige as well. Come on, this is bubblegum. I consider myself a Liberal WITH Gun rights, but this ticks me off. Did I just wake up on the wrong side of the bed this morning?
