JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
I'm not worried about this whole mag thing anymore. My LCM's (I.E. Normal Capacity mags) will stay on my property, and I will have neutered mags for carrying in public. And, that won't even be an issue because I will be carrying a 1911 or a revolver in public.

Happy sticks are for the range or cheesing burglars at home in self defense situations.
 
I'm not worried about this whole mag thing anymore. My LCM's (I.E. Normal Capacity mags) will stay on my property, and I will have neutered mags for carrying in public. And, that won't even be an issue because I will be carrying a 1911 or a revolver in public.

Happy sticks are for the range or cheesing burglars at home in self defense situations.
Don't change the subject.
 
Carpet is going grey faster than the drapes. But it's a close second.
1746939380934.jpeg
 
Yeah, I guess don't do stupid things when carrying out in public and you won't have to worry about having to prove anything. If you do have a defensive use situation, and the shooting was justifiable, you will likely lose the mags and the gun, at least for a time.

If you had to mag dump to stop an attacker, and it took more than ten rounds, then I guess it would be justified. But hey, you lived. A misdemeanor charge and losing a mag is better than being dead, so…..

I am just choosing not to go there….8 rounds of 45 ACP or six rounds of 357 magnum is what I will choose for most situations anyway.

To comply or not, that's an individual decision that likely won't be an issue unless one does something stupid.
 
This may be far fetched but here goes…
If you have to prove that you purchased high capacity magazines before a specific date…
Put down a piece of newspaper, clearly showing today's date and lay magazines on top. Take a photo and voila, proof.
Probably a goofy idea full of holes but hey, it's the internet. Goofy ideas abound. And The Dude abides.
I agree that any prosecution would have to prove that you violated a regulation. They have to prove guilt. You don't have to prove innocence, as a matter of law, and the Constitution.

But here a few things that can trip you up:

The item in question wasn't being manufactured before a ban became effective, ie, a gun magazine made by XYZ co, instead of Magpul, or the original firearm manufacturer. Or an AR manufacturer that wasn't in business before a ban on AR's ( by type ).

But let's say you come into a handful of military surplus AR magazines that were made during the Vietnam War era, after a ban on standard cap magazines has been passed and implemented. How is law enforcement going to know when you acquired them? ( Especially since they are 50+ years old? Hint: keep your mouth shut).
 

Upcoming Events

New Classified Ads

Back Top