- Messages
- 4,274
- Reactions
- 7,990
Probably looking for jizz…Is that why Doc was shining a black light in my rack?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Probably looking for jizz…Is that why Doc was shining a black light in my rack?
If they can't even implement the bill that they're desperately trying to force through, because despite having what... Two years? They still don't have the infrastructure to enforce such a bill... The. What's the point?How do you mean? Measure 114 is still on the books, on hold pending whatever Oregon Supreme Court decides (they heard oral arguments last fall of 2025), and potentially pending 9th Circus relating to Duncan V Bonta..but there's a high likelihood of Oregon Supremes deciding in favor of State simply because of who's on the bench (all D appointees), even if Raschio's ruling is robust with citations from Oregon Supreme Courts own case history , Oregon Constitution text, tradition, and timeframe (when Oregon became a State, technology of firearms and the like).
Wasn't he really more like a sock monkey…I don't think the pressure is from Oregon voters. It's most likely from donor groups that are running the show behind the scenes. The Dems have a powerful and well funded machine. Most of these bills are sent in from DC with political career consequences for failure. Don't believe me, ask yourself how Biden actually made the tough decisions and set policy. IMO, he had little to do with any of it and was just a sock puppet.
Yeah. Weren't the two biggest Donors to the 114 push Soros and the Wife of the Microsoft CoFounder? Neither of whom LIVE in the state.I don't think the pressure is from Oregon voters. It's most likely from donor groups that are running the show behind the scenes.
Exactly what I was thinking. Letting the crazy left wing radicals indulge their wacko thinking unchecked means the metro retards will force it on us statewide.Let's remember that when 114 was a ballot measure lots of gun folks state wide did noting to campaign against it. 114 passed by 22,000 votes; lots of Republicans did not vote then as well. Now, the anti-hunting/fishing bill is picking up signatures and the outcome will be what? Remember the anti-bear and cougar hunting bill that passed about 30 years ago? This anti-hunting bill is similar. And, more antis moved into Portland and else ware.
which was what happened on 114
True. it got very close to being blocked. There was what, barely less than 25k vote difference between pass and no pass ?which was what happened on 114
It was one of the last acts of "Sham"ea Fagan.True. it got very close to being blocked. There was what, barely less than 25k vote difference between pass and no pass ?
62.3% voter turnout for 2022 Oregon midterm election. Wondering if, this meant a large % of the "no" votes were "disqualified" for whatever reason .. I distinctly remember some members here stating their ballots never got counted
It's maddening to me that people still believe this nonsense. There is ZERO proof of this. Alexx keeps spouting this nonsense as well for Washington: blaming gun owners for being outvoted by suggesting they didn't vote, despite the fact that there is no evidence of that. Every single pro-gun person with a voice in this state has practically been screaming to the heavens about this stuff for the past 3 years now at least.Let's remember that when 114 was a ballot measure lots of gun folks state wide did noting to campaign against it. 114 passed by 22,000 votes; lots of Republicans did not vote then as well. Now, the anti-hunting/fishing bill is picking up signatures and the outcome will be what? Remember the anti-bear and cougar hunting bill that passed about 30 years ago? This anti-hunting bill is similar. And, more antis moved into Portland and else ware.
62.3% turnout.It's maddening to me that people still believe this nonsense. There is ZERO proof of this. Alexx keeps spouting this nonsense as well for Washington: blaming gun owners for being outvoted by suggesting they didn't vote, despite the fact that there is no evidence of that. Every single pro-gun person with a voice in this state has practically been screaming to the heavens about this stuff for the past 3 years now at least.
It's like some of you can't fathom the fact that we are not only outvoted but outspent (by a considerable margin) by a bigger population of Leftists than there are of us. Jesus, it's simple math. The I-5 Corridor is a Leftist highway from California to here. Where are our Conservatives coming from? Nowhere....nobody with a brain cell in their head and a gun on their waist wants to live here. Whereas Leftists see endless opportunities here to put down roots and expand, and they have the money to do it.
I guess by your logic there's a magical barrier on the border with Idaho that just causes gun owners to stop voting in WA and OR, but yet they vote by an overwhelming majority in Idaho? No, they ARE an overwhelming majority in Idaho....we are NOT the overwhelming majority here, and likely never will be.
Stop blaming gun owners for being outvoted and outspent. It's pathetic.

LOL, THAT is your logic? There are 25,000 Leftist cat ladies just in Portland alone.....good luck finding that many gun owners there. Again, simple math. It's why Blue states are BLUE and Red states are RED.62.3% turnout.
975,862 yes, 50.65%
950,891 no, 49.35%
A difference of just under 25,000 votes. Less than 1% difference.
If more than 25,000 gun owners bothered to vote no?
I couldn't find any concrete number for total number of ballots turned in, statewide, only county by county which means more math which I'm not in the mood for right now![]()
My logic is that there's a significant portion of the registered voter population that did not vote, it could have gone either way if 10-20% more voters went all in. But 25,000 spread in 36 counties is not a significant number of voters to get, particularly looking at the fact of only 62.3% turnout rate. This is also why Kotek is banking on fewer voters in May for the gas tax bill instead of the November elections where more people will vote.LOL, THAT is your logic? There are 25,000 Leftist cat ladies just in Portland alone.....good luck finding that many gun owners there. Again, simple math. It's why Blue states are BLUE and Red states are RED.
And you are assuming that that 10-20% would have been gun owners? In Oregon?My logic is that there's a significant portion of the registered voter population that did not vote, it could have gone either way if 10-20% more voters went all in. But 25,000 spread in 36 counties is not a significant number of voters to get, particularly looking at the fact of only 62.3% turnout rate. This is also why Kotek is banking on fewer voters in May for the gas tax bill instead of the November elections where more people will vote.
..show me any data where red counties in Oregon had better than 70% turnout