- Messages
- 1,671
- Reactions
- 1,286
Everyone should take note: There was NO budget cut involved. In reality, there was an INCREASE in spending instead. The dollars "cut" consisted of unspent TARP and stimulus funds, money from construction projects that came in under budget, and other savings which were not actually slated to be spent anyway. BUT there was an ADDITIONAL $50 billion given to the Pentagon that does exist.
So for Tea Partiers and Democrats alike, you were given the sleeves from the budgetary vest. Both sides assume that the American public is too dogmatic and too ill-informed and too ill-educated to figure out that it was actually a spending increase, not a spending cut.
You've been had, folks! And once again it proves that what politicians (regardless of party) believe is true.
In fact, as the Washington Post notes, when the cost of occupying Iraq and Afghanistan, attacking Pakistan on the side and bombing Libya and other war on (manufactured) terror ventures are factored in, the budget increases by $3.3 billion.
<broken link removed>
So for Tea Partiers and Democrats alike, you were given the sleeves from the budgetary vest. Both sides assume that the American public is too dogmatic and too ill-informed and too ill-educated to figure out that it was actually a spending increase, not a spending cut.
You've been had, folks! And once again it proves that what politicians (regardless of party) believe is true.
In fact, as the Washington Post notes, when the cost of occupying Iraq and Afghanistan, attacking Pakistan on the side and bombing Libya and other war on (manufactured) terror ventures are factored in, the budget increases by $3.3 billion.
<broken link removed>