Silver Lifetime
- Messages
- 42,994
- Reactions
- 111,715
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wasn't that the big engine that was responsible for many deaths due to the rear cylinders not cooling and starting on fire?? Forgot what bomber they were on that it caused so many to go down. They were stuck with them at the time because there was no time to come up with anything else due to the war raging.Graduated in '63 from Aviation HS in NYC with my A&P ticket at 17, joined the AF and was immediately given a 5 level bypass specialest and thrown on the flight line. I ended up on C-124's with 4 R-4360's to care for. 28 cylinders, 2 stage super charger with ADI, a pressures carb that had about 100sq/in of barrel area and as big as most 4 cylinder car blocks. Loved wrenching and doing run ups on them, good times.
Slo-mo-shun!Not as big but reminded me when I was a kid being able to watch the big boats on the big lake here start up when they had those Rolls engines in them. Damn those were fun to watch and listen too.
Not the race boats with those engines - they went fast!Slo-mo-tion!
Slo-mo-shun was the name of my favorite hydro at the timeNot the race boats with those engines - they went fast!
I spent one summer in the CG at the Tri-Cities with the races there. That was fun. Our job was to keep the people near the shore. Lots of bikini babes on tubes/etc.
Actually, until the B-52 was introduced, the B-29's, B-50's (B-29's with P&W R-4360's) and the B-36 were the strategic bomber fleet. B-47 jets were a stop-gap, but were "medium-range" and the piston-engined bombers were expected to carry the trans-continental loads. All these were outmoded, and were replaced as soon as an acceptable jet was developed, but they soldiered on.^^Are you thinking of the magnesium in the B29 motors?
Post WWII there weren't many radial engined bombers. B26 and A1 come to mind
Yes.Wasn't that the big engine that was responsible for many deaths due to the rear cylinders not cooling and starting on fire?? Forgot what bomber they were on that it caused so many to go down. They were stuck with them at the time because there was no time to come up with anything else due to the war raging.
You did good, thanks . . . . .
Forgot about the B-50.Actually, until the B-52 was introduced, the B-29's, B-50's (B-29's with P&W R-4360's) and the B-36 were the strategic bomber fleet. B-47 jets were a stop-gap, but were "medium-range" and the piston-engined bombers were expected to carry the trans-continental loads. All these were outmoded, and were replaced as soon as an acceptable jet was developed, but they soldiered on.
Yeah, thinking magnesium. The wrong material to expose to the high heat of those rear cylinders!^^Are you thinking of the magnesium in the B29 motors?
Post WWII there weren't many radial engined bombers. B26 and A1 come to mind