- Messages
- 6,985
- Reactions
- 21,487
While doing some research for the book that's going to be released soon, I found some interesting information that seems relevant to the nation concerns we have at the moment.
According to, Mexican government sources, that report firearms seized in their country that belongs to cartels and Mexican gangs. Were manufactured and sold in this country. What I am finding is, these were sold legally to persons that eventually brought them south of the border. How that is done I am not sure at this point. But the guns that are being provided to cartels are often times purchased here and then brought across the border. California has a new law coming up about purchasing so many firearms within a given time. That is how I started looking at this for research and then found out there may actually be a hidden reason or agenda to support such a law in California.( I do not agree ).
First of all I am not accepting the fact that, a limitation should be drafted into law limiting how many firearms one could purchase. I am finding that two things that we enjoy actually contribute to illegal activity. That is nothing new as we are well aware that many criminals use a firearm to commit a crime. And in this country generally the firearms or stolen there used a crime. So it was my surprise when I found out legally purchased firearms in this country were given to criminals in other countries. Interesting facts but nonetheless that's how it seems to work. And it could be said that our easy purchasing system in a person with $30,000 of spending money could easily purchase cases of firearms and all they would have to do is get them south of the border. Stolen firearms in Mexico are nonexistent to a point because most of the people there do not have firearms, so the only way to acquire them would be through some kind of onsource. As was seen in 2015, a California senator was arrested for gunrunning. But it appears he was using the same type of system purchasing legal firearms and then tranferring them down to the border.
Now your wondering at this point why would bring this up, because it seems to hint having an ability to purchase firearms reasonably, could be arming cartels who bring drugs and other problems into this country?
The point is if certain political parties are concerned about paying for a wall along our border, well obviously they are aware that firearms are coming out of this country and going into other countries over that same border they were trying to keep people from coming in if that makes sense. That's why I posted this. I know this presents an argument for limiting the amount of firearms one could purchase, or making it more difficult because gunrunning is something that is occurring legally. So just something to think about when were having this issue about a wall it's not just a matter of protecting what's coming in, we may need to be concerned about what's going out and how that affects our Second Amendment rights when it's being abused in a criminal way.
According to, Mexican government sources, that report firearms seized in their country that belongs to cartels and Mexican gangs. Were manufactured and sold in this country. What I am finding is, these were sold legally to persons that eventually brought them south of the border. How that is done I am not sure at this point. But the guns that are being provided to cartels are often times purchased here and then brought across the border. California has a new law coming up about purchasing so many firearms within a given time. That is how I started looking at this for research and then found out there may actually be a hidden reason or agenda to support such a law in California.( I do not agree ).
First of all I am not accepting the fact that, a limitation should be drafted into law limiting how many firearms one could purchase. I am finding that two things that we enjoy actually contribute to illegal activity. That is nothing new as we are well aware that many criminals use a firearm to commit a crime. And in this country generally the firearms or stolen there used a crime. So it was my surprise when I found out legally purchased firearms in this country were given to criminals in other countries. Interesting facts but nonetheless that's how it seems to work. And it could be said that our easy purchasing system in a person with $30,000 of spending money could easily purchase cases of firearms and all they would have to do is get them south of the border. Stolen firearms in Mexico are nonexistent to a point because most of the people there do not have firearms, so the only way to acquire them would be through some kind of onsource. As was seen in 2015, a California senator was arrested for gunrunning. But it appears he was using the same type of system purchasing legal firearms and then tranferring them down to the border.
Now your wondering at this point why would bring this up, because it seems to hint having an ability to purchase firearms reasonably, could be arming cartels who bring drugs and other problems into this country?
The point is if certain political parties are concerned about paying for a wall along our border, well obviously they are aware that firearms are coming out of this country and going into other countries over that same border they were trying to keep people from coming in if that makes sense. That's why I posted this. I know this presents an argument for limiting the amount of firearms one could purchase, or making it more difficult because gunrunning is something that is occurring legally. So just something to think about when were having this issue about a wall it's not just a matter of protecting what's coming in, we may need to be concerned about what's going out and how that affects our Second Amendment rights when it's being abused in a criminal way.