JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
Most of the Bulldogs I have seen were in .450, not .455, Safe load is to flush seat a .454 round ball with 3 grains of Bullseye and smear a pea sized dab of grease over the ball.
 
I have on rare occasions carried my late war Walther PPK Dural in .32 ACP.




IMG_7650.jpeg IMG_1577.jpeg
 
Last Edited:
As I did a bit of shooting with the revolver today, the little Webley in .32 S&W Long could, in theory, work as a brisk walk / hiking piece. (Though there are more modern and powerful guns I will continue to carry on those outings. Still, this one is surprisingly accurate and there are potent loads made for the cartridge it is chambered in.)

Webley_senderismo1.jpg

The holsters for S&W 632 UC and 31—1 fit well too.

Webley_senderismo2.jpg
 
Not long ago I was looking for a very lightweight carry revolver for day hikes and such. I was very tempted by a smaller format Webley Mark Ⅳ in .32 S&W Long I found on Gunbroker:

View attachment 2153335

However, as I was looking for something in one of the "magnum" cartridges (e.g., .32 H&R Magnum, .327 Federal Magnum) and since older guns are a bit like rolling the dice, I went with a contemporary Smith & Wesson revolver made of alloys. (Though I kind of kick myself for not bidding on the little top-break, the Smith is working out so far. Including a vigorous walk today.)

Between that and a recent thread in which various C&R carry pieces have been mentioned, it got me to thinking of the topic. Using the standard definition in these here United States ...

  1. Firearms manufactured at least 50 years prior the current date, but not including replicas thereof;
  2. Firearms certified by the curator of a municipal, state, or federal museum which exhibits firearms to be curios or relics of museum interest; and
  3. Firearms which derive a substantial part of their monetary value from the fact that they are novel, rare, or bizarre or from the fact of their association with some historical figure, period, or event.
Any C&R handguns you carry on such outings? Thanks for sharing.

To answer my own question, off the top of my head, the only one that comes to mind that I might is a Webley Ⅳ in .38/200 (or .38 S&W). I haven't carried it afield, but is rather a (relatively) quiet, low-recoil revolver I sometimes shoot outside home office.

late reply lol but i carry a luger love conceal carrying a millsurp
 
My concern with any carry gun is if you have to use it, it will most likely be taken as evidence. Guaranteed it will be returned? Perhaps not. So I prefer to only carry something I can replace at a reasonable price.
 
My concern with any carry gun is if you have to use it, it will most likely be taken as evidence. Guaranteed it will be returned? Perhaps not. So I prefer to only carry something I can replace at a reasonable price.
Hmmm... If I have to use my gun, I'd rather it be one that I'm very comfortable with and has stellar reliability. If I walk away and my gun never comes back, the price of that gun would not be even a small consideration. It's a tool and nothing more.

Earlier in this thread I believe I mentioned my wife's Grandpa's 1908 Colt. If I used that gun and it went away, I would be a little sad, but still, my life is worth far more to me than any item in the world.
 
A lot of my revolvers fit this.

Colt cobra in .38 special is actually a frequent carry choice. Ppk in .32 as well. Detective Special in .32 s&w long is also one that gets carried.
 
Hmmm... If I have to use my gun, I'd rather it be one that I'm very comfortable with and has stellar reliability. If I walk away and my gun never comes back, the price of that gun would not be even a small consideration. It's a tool and nothing more.

Earlier in this thread I believe I mentioned my wife's Grandpa's 1908 Colt. If I used that gun and it went away, I would be a little sad, but still, my life is worth far more to me than any item in the world.
Perhaps a little more explanation: Assuming I have a more "modern" handgun with which I feel just as competent I would choose the more modern which is more easily replaced.
 
Kind of.

Remember all the guns Ruger roll marked with the Bicentennial markings?
Sometimes I carry my ''1976'' MK I in the woods.




Hard to believe they're 50 years old now.
 

Upcoming Events

New Classified Ads

Back Top