Ashland never fails to be the nazis of Oregon

Discussion in 'Legal & Political Archive' started by Oregonhunter5, Feb 17, 2014.

  1. Martini_Up

    Martini_Up
    NW USA
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,738
    Likes Received:
    2,062
    Didn't San Diego just go through something like this?
     
  2. nwo

    nwo
    Southern Oregon
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    245
    I won't set a foot into Ashland . Ever.
     
  3. Oregonhunter5

    Oregonhunter5
    2C IDAHO
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,688
    Likes Received:
    3,766
    Here are a few relies in the comment section of oregonlive.

    Antisocial Network19 minutes ago
    What kind of useless imbecile would oppose a ordnance requiring firearms owners store their weapons in a manner that prevents unauthorized access? Whoever these drooling dimwits are, they ought not be trusted with so much as a SuperSoaker. How can any thinking human being oppose mandatory safe firearms storage? Is there some new interpretation of the Second Amendment that requires firearms be available to anyone who can see them, the family kindergarten child, the depressed or bullied teenager, the roommate on drugs, the burglar raiding the family home while they are away at work? Listen up NRAbies and think this over well. This kind of lunatic opposition to sensible constitutional firearms regulation won't help you preserve your rational right to keep and bear when it costs innocent lives. It will only hurt all of us including those of us who want to preserve safe adult responsible firearms rights. Use your damned melon already!

    FlagLikeReplyShare

    Antisocial Network14 minutes ago
    It is extremist unbalanced gunnies like you that will eventually cost all of us the right to possess firearms. I realize people like you don't have the gray matter to understand why mindless opposition to sensible firearms regulations will have the opposite effect you intend. Just take my word for it and go back to your John Wayne movies. When you mix lawful rational responsible gun ownership issues with lunatic extremist positions you only undermine your own cause. At least TRY to think that over.

    FlagLikeReplyShare

    Here's my response.
    I'm extreme? Lol.
    Ok. Your probably right. I'm extremely confident and you seem like a 5'1 gent with a complex. Yes? No?
    Or are you just a nazi?
    Either way, I must make you feel weak. I'm sorry, I'm really friendly.
    Now back to John Wayne. Love that man! ;)
     
    Dunerunner, LogicBomb, GOG and 5 others like this.
  4. 3MTA3

    3MTA3
    Western Oregon
    Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    3,549
    Likes Received:
    9,872
    As usual, Progressives passing restrictions on law abiding citizens to fix a problem that does not exist. Progressives kill Liberty the same way a boa constrictor kills its prey - by progressively restricting the freedom of its victim until it dies.
     
    Dunerunner and (deleted member) like this.
  5. DMax

    DMax
    Yamhill
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,713
    Likes Received:
    2,793
    Its going to be fun watching crime go up and there ecomomy go into the tank.

    "TO BE OR NOT TO BE"
    :thumbup:
     
  6. tiggers97

    tiggers97
    United States
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    902
    Likes Received:
    855
    If they still feel hurt, please have them fill one of these out;

    https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?...96.1073741827.1425196144383279&type=1&theater


    Note: Be sure to "like" these pages, or use them as sources for "using satire and humor" as a means to educate. And I think it would be the ultimate if they got more likes than the actual MomsDemandAction page :laugh:

    Mom's Demand Action - Uncovored
    Moms Against Everything
    Hypocrisy and Stupidity of Gun Control Advocates
     
    duane black and (deleted member) like this.
  7. duane black

    duane black
    Washington
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    849
    Likes Received:
    411
  8. Mark W.

    Mark W.
    Silverton, OR
    Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    6,188
    Likes Received:
    6,114
    duane black and (deleted member) like this.
  9. duane black

    duane black
    Washington
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    849
    Likes Received:
    411
    Ashlands legal department statement sums it up nicely. " the ordinance could send a message to the Legislature about the community's wishes, but it says there may be no net impact on safety because gun-related incidents in the city are already low. "



    not-again-picard_21_zps300a8bdd.jpg
     
  10. Mark W.

    Mark W.
    Silverton, OR
    Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    6,188
    Likes Received:
    6,114
    My comment to the article

     
    Dunerunner and (deleted member) like this.
  11. SOrez

    SOrez
    SOR
    Active Member

    Messages:
    236
    Likes Received:
    216
    ashholeland. 9 years ago a kid partied at a judges house in asland (she and her husband were out of town) did drugs and drank jaegermeister got drunk. He proceede to drive to medford, engaged the police in high speed chase through medford,ran a redlight and hit my sons blazer. The crash killed my son and permanently crippled my sons friend. The stuff that was said and was done was unbelievable to me.
     
  12. BAMCIS

    BAMCIS
    Eugene
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,203
    Likes Received:
    1,010
    These idiots don't understand. This is "covered" already under the reckless endangering statute that every state already has. If a kid gets a hold of an unsecured gun and does something tragic with it then I have no problem with the owner being prosecuted by a LAW ALREADY ON THE BOOKS!

    I read a few of the comments below the story. There are a quite few well intentioned (I'm sure) and misinformed people living in a world of unicorns, meadows and butterflies.

    Libs like to call themselves "educated". This is exactly where these idiots should be directing their efforts. Educating the kids to leave gun(s) alone or better yet to handle them safely and educating the idiot gun owners out there (yes there are some idiots gun owners) to be responsible. But these morons trying to push this new law expect us, the responsible gun owners, to do the educating. But after thinking about it, this makes sense. It gives them more time to teach the kids the virtues of socialism in school and labeling us irresponsible.
     
  13. captqc

    captqc
    Tigard
    Silver Supporter Silver Supporter

    Messages:
    954
    Likes Received:
    564
    Can't we give Ashland to the Peoples Republik of Kalifornia??? and while we are at it give Portland to Washington. Then all we would have to deal with are the leftie flakes in Eugene! :huh::banana: Gary
     
  14. GOG

    GOG
    State of Jefferson
    Silver Supporter Silver Supporter

    Messages:
    1,657
    Likes Received:
    2,391
    "...This kind of lunatic opposition to sensible constitutional firearms regulation won't help you preserve your rational right to keep and bear when it costs innocent lives."

    Somehow I missed this in the Constitution and B.O.R. I'd appreciate it if someone could point it out to me. I guess I'm kind of slow.

    Liberals; peace, love, happiness. But only for them.
     
  15. Norm0931

    Norm0931
    Hillsboro, OR
    Sgt. Sheep Silver Vendor 2016 Volunteer

    Messages:
    1,509
    Likes Received:
    1,664
    Different situation. In San Diego a gun owner who was carrying unloaded was unlawfully detained, disarmed, then arrested by the cops. He filmed the whole thing and sued the crap out of the city. So then they made it illegal to carry at all. So now you couldn't open carry and the San Diego Sheriff had a requirement of showing "need" to be judged by him for issuance of a chl.

    In fact, when I was at Miramar working as a shooting instructor in the Marines, we actually have the Sheriff's range on our base. We worked with them occasionally because, most of them were bubbleguming horrible shots. I was denied a CHL because,"I was more likely to kill a suspect due to military training."

    So what you had there was a de facto ban on carrying firearms. It was illegal to open carry and the process for concealed was so restrictive and baised toward favortism that the court determined it was violating your right to carry for self defense. IF Ashland is also denying CHLs by the truckload AND bans open carry, then you could see a court case.
     

Share This Page