Army Replacing the M-2 50 Cal?

Discussion in 'General Firearm Discussion' started by Pandaz3, May 2, 2016.

Tags:
  1. Pandaz3

    Pandaz3
    Cornelius, Oregon
    NRA Lifetime Member Platinum Supporter Gold Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    1,676
    Likes Received:
    1,203
  2. wired

    wired
    Yakima
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,646
    Likes Received:
    3,104
    Having carried 1/2 of a M2 50 cal on a 10 mile march once I applaud the effort and authorize the US Government to use my tax money to develop and field the lightweight 50 Cal.
     
    MTpockets, AndyinEverson and Ura-Ki like this.
  3. Ura-Ki

    Ura-Ki
    Sub Light Speed
    Silver Supporter Silver Supporter

    Messages:
    5,541
    Likes Received:
    16,605
    From what I see the new .50 is much lighter, more compact, easier to field strip and service/repair, and has a slower rate of fire! Sounds like a good idea to me, except the rate of fire. Maybe they should come up with a switch or something to change the rate on the go! One setting to provide accurate fire discipline, and one setting to Rock and Roll.
     
  4. decklin

    decklin
    WA
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    487
    Likes Received:
    647
    They've been discussing a new or alternative weapon to the M2 for a very long time.
    At one point they played with the idea of a system that changed from what was essentially an M2 to a MK19.
    I think they built one in 2009. I don't know if it worked.
    One thing is for sure, that M2 is going to be very difficult to replace.
     
  5. erudne

    erudne
    The Pie Matrix
    PPL Say Sleeping W/Your Rifle Is A bad Thing?

    Messages:
    6,278
    Likes Received:
    6,971
    Back in the 1960's someone developed the M-85 .50 cal gun and stuck it into the M-60 tank. What a POS, it did not work reliably and parts were constantly breaking which is why the Abrams tank has a Browning M-2. If it ain't broke, don't fix it!o_O
     
    decklin likes this.
  6. Ura-Ki

    Ura-Ki
    Sub Light Speed
    Silver Supporter Silver Supporter

    Messages:
    5,541
    Likes Received:
    16,605
    Why mess with a good thing! If it aint broke, dont mess with it. The M2 A-1 was a good up grade that fixed head space and timing and that kept them running a lot longer, plus it kept idiots from "tuning" the timing key and blowing them up! I could see making it lighter weight, but is the weight really a problem with the M2 in the first place?
     
    decklin likes this.
  7. wired

    wired
    Yakima
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,646
    Likes Received:
    3,104
    Its not a problem when mounted on a tank. If you have to carry one up the side of a hill with its tripod , T&E, Spare barrel bag and a thousand rounds or so of ammo then sure, the weight becomes a issue.
     
    decklin likes this.
  8. Ura-Ki

    Ura-Ki
    Sub Light Speed
    Silver Supporter Silver Supporter

    Messages:
    5,541
    Likes Received:
    16,605
    I never had to pack one very far, so I hear ya on that!
     
  9. clearconscience

    clearconscience
    Vancouver, WA
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    7,302
    Likes Received:
    12,754
    Kinda like revamping the 1911, why screw up what works. Knowing the govt they will make it prone to failures and be over budget by billions like the F35
     
    Ura-Ki likes this.
  10. Ura-Ki

    Ura-Ki
    Sub Light Speed
    Silver Supporter Silver Supporter

    Messages:
    5,541
    Likes Received:
    16,605
    I'm from a different place on the M2 then many of you, The M2 WAS our primary weapon system! I do wish it was lighter, and I do wish it had a faster rate of fire. The mini gun was too fast and burned through ammo and didn't have the hitting power or effective range we needed. We also tried the GE CAL-50 and it worked great, but it was even heavier then the M-2 and if it got bent, you were really screwed! It's going to be interesting to see what they come up with to replace Ol Guts and Glory with!
     
  11. coop44

    coop44
    Tacoma ,WA
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,756
    Likes Received:
    1,193
    If all they do is substitute titanium for steel, and don't change the design, I would go for that. Rate of fire is fine as it is, faster just burns up barrels and ammo (really heavy bulky ammo). JMB designs are timeless and still work, ask gaston glock, most of his pistol is rehashed JMB designs.
     
    Ura-Ki likes this.
  12. Sstrand

    Sstrand
    La Grande OR
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,145
    Likes Received:
    3,892
    It should be simple enough to redesign. All it needs to be able to do is have the white surrender flag come out of the barrel every time the trigger is pulled!?!?!?!?

    Sheldon
     
  13. Ura-Ki

    Ura-Ki
    Sub Light Speed
    Silver Supporter Silver Supporter

    Messages:
    5,541
    Likes Received:
    16,605
    French Much?
     
  14. Sstrand

    Sstrand
    La Grande OR
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,145
    Likes Received:
    3,892
    John Kerry's dream . . .
    He served in Vietnam don't you know!?!?!?!

    Sheldon
     
    Ura-Ki likes this.

Share This Page