- Messages
- 17,471
- Reactions
- 36,484
Popular Mechanics - Three Rifles That Could Replace the Army's M4A1 Carbine ... or not
Or is it a new season and therefore time to re-hash.
My gut says no. Just because something is about 60 doesn't' mean you toss it away
If you need an 800 m rifle, use the existing stock of M14s. What do our NATO allies use in 7.62x51 ?
FAL's ?
Soon enough robots will take the field and something else will be called for.
Of course this ultimately comes down to a caliber argument.
Garand proposed something about 7mm - the first M1s were not in 30-06. That was a Army requirement due to surplus WW1 stocks.
Stoner proposed something about 7mm - the 5.56 was an Air Force (McNamera? ) change.
Anyways - 6mm, 6.5, 7, 7.5 or 8 anyone?
I think 7.5+ were due to limitations in power from the start of the 20th century.
Or is it a new season and therefore time to re-hash.
Three Rifles That Could Replace the Army's M4A1 Carbine"In new comments to the Senate Armed Services Committee, U.S. Army Chief of Staff Mark Milleyhas said the Army is "taking a hard look" at a new German assault rifle and other designs to replace its existing weapons."
My gut says no. Just because something is about 60 doesn't' mean you toss it away
If you need an 800 m rifle, use the existing stock of M14s. What do our NATO allies use in 7.62x51 ?
FAL's ?
Soon enough robots will take the field and something else will be called for.
Of course this ultimately comes down to a caliber argument.
Garand proposed something about 7mm - the first M1s were not in 30-06. That was a Army requirement due to surplus WW1 stocks.
Stoner proposed something about 7mm - the 5.56 was an Air Force (McNamera? ) change.
Anyways - 6mm, 6.5, 7, 7.5 or 8 anyone?
I think 7.5+ were due to limitations in power from the start of the 20th century.