JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
I won't trust this AI crap until it can give me an accurate answer to this question: If it takes a chicken and a half a day and a half to lay an egg and a half, how long does it take a one-legged frog to kick the seeds out of a dill pickle?
Well, no wonder the AI got it wrong. It was confused because the real question is:

"If it takes a chicken and half, a day and a half, to kick the seeds out of a dill pickle, how many hotcakes does it take to shingle a doghouse?

This was my mother-in-law's favorite line,

And the non-AI generated answer is..."one, if it's big enough."
 
Well, no wonder the AI got it wrong. It was confused because the real question is:

"If it takes a chicken and half, a day and a half, to kick the seeds out of a dill pickle, how many hotcakes does it take to shingle a doghouse?

This was my mother-in-law's favorite line,

And the non-AI generated answer is..."one, if it's big enough."
That question was found to be a mistranslation from the original Sanskrit and is only accurate to 47.2 decimal places. I posted the version translated by McGillicuddy in 1937, which is more precise.
 
I think this AI revolution is going to be a bust for the average person.

Maybe I'm an outlier but I can't see how AI is going to greatly benefit me in my daily life.
 
I think this AI revolution is going to be a bust for the average person.

Maybe I'm an outlier but I can't see how AI is going to greatly benefit me in my daily life.
At this point, I agree. I have a family member who uses it for certain projects, and I can see that it is helpful to him. However, I'm seeing that it is letting lazy people become even lazier at work. Someone sent me a document that they admitted they used AI tools to compile the information. It was pure rubbish. The information was often not relevant or off the mark, and I've shared before where I've seen data that is clearly false (e.g., statistics where the percentages are way over 100%).

In areas such as word processing/editing, there are some tools that are developing well. As long as you are using them as a grammar assist and not relying on them to write things for you, I can see the benefit to some, including me.
 
At this point, I agree. I have a family member who uses it for certain projects, and I can see that it is helpful to him. However, I'm seeing that it is letting lazy people become even lazier at work. Someone sent me a document that they admitted they used AI tools to compile the information. It was pure rubbish. The information was often not relevant or off the mark, and I've shared before where I've seen data that is clearly false (e.g., statistics where the percentages are way over 100%).

In areas such as word processing/editing, there are some tools that are developing well. As long as you are using them as a grammar assist and not relying on them to write things for you, I can see the benefit to some, including me.
Some have said it will be a greater benefit than modern internet. I love the heck out of the internet but I don't think I will have as much appreciation for AI.
 
I work as an IT Solution Architect looking to move into management roles (Sr. Manager/Director; eventually, CTO), and I agree with your assessments @arakboss. The danger of AI, as I tell my federal clients all the time, is to allow AI to make decisions that have direct negative consequences on human beings regardless of said human beings character, actions, or alleged guilt. Also, there always needs to be an accessible and fail-safe off button, switch or lever.
 
The one question that will kill AI....


Why?



The full potential that AI will eventually become....


IMG_3847.jpeg
 
I already see how AI on you tube has lying videos all over the place.
Was videos that never happened, cars and motorcycles that never have nor will exist.

If I wanted lies Id watch media.
 
For those who did not watch the "AI Gun Detection System" alerted that one of the students had a gun. It was a bag of chips. This is what I'm seeing as the incredible danger of AI, it is an amazingly believable liar. Then you listen to the humans managing the system and they say things like, "The system was working properly," and "it did what it was supposed to do." No, it did not. It's not supposed to alert on a bag of Doritos as a gun.

I'm continually seeing bad info and data presented as fact, and the masses are believing it because it's AI so it must be true.
 
No use for AI , at least for me.

We already have trouble with many folks unable to tell real from fake...AI ain't helping with this.

Also...
Many folks are pure lazy....and are willing to let AI do the work or research for them.
Doing so stifles creativity and learning....
As well as putting out information that simply ain't true...and having it accepted as the truth.

No Thank You.
I want no part of this at all.
Andy
 

Upcoming Events

New Classified Ads

Back Top