- Messages
- 204
- Reactions
- 388
Why should an FFL have to add the guns to their inventory. Why not just a BGC when they leave them (10.00 for all the guns, just to make sure the FFL can legally take them). And another BGC when they are retrieved. The FFL could bill them a nominal fee to store them. And, that is if any FFL would agree to that in the first place.
If they really want to get suicidal people to get their guns away from them during a crisis, and I;m sure they would have to be checked out by a doc before they could legally retrieve them, why make it so expensive and difficult, if they're really interested in protecting the public?
Seems to me they are pricing guys who would want to do this out. Nobody would be willing to do th\is if there wasn't a good chance of getting their guns back later, when they feel safe.
It just seems like so much book sheet to me.
They do this as a way to require a BGC and track them. The purpose of requiring the BGC in this scenario I think is to find ways to deny more people transfers.